Variable Zoom X-ray CT for Composite Laminates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) technologies face challenges in achieving high-resolution nondestructive evaluation of small critical flaws in composite structures with large in-plane dimensions, particularly due to limitations in scanning large specimens and inadequate resolution for accurate detection of defects and damage modes, leading to uncertainties in structural integrity and durability of composite materials.

Innovation Solution

A variable zoom X-ray CT method that involves a non-conventional scanning trajectory where the specimen rotates and translates towards the X-ray source, allowing for greater spatial resolution by varying the source-to-object distance, combined with a novel reconstruction weighting scheme based on the distance from the panel to the X-ray source, enhancing the quality of 3D reconstructions and defect detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional X-ray CT scanning is used on composite structures with large in-plane dimensions, then the entire structure can be scanned, but the spatial resolution is insufficient for detecting small critical flaws

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial resolutionVSAvoidin-plane dimension coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the large composite structure into multiple regions of interest (ROIs) and scans each region separately with high magnification. The structure is segmented into overlapping fields of view, allowing high-resolution detection of small flaws in each segment while maintaining coverage of the entire large-area structure through systematic scanning of multiple ROIs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a variable zoom capability that changes the magnification level dynamically during scanning. By varying the source-to-object distance, the system can switch between low magnification for broad coverage and high magnification for detailed flaw detection, effectively adding a dimensional control parameter to resolve the contradiction between area coverage and resolution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If high magnification is used to improve resolution of small flaws, then detection accuracy improves, but the field of view becomes too limited to capture sufficient structural context

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidfield of view
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSArea of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic zooming where the magnification level is adjusted in real-time based on the inspection requirements. The system can switch between different magnification levels (e.g., 5x, 10x, 20x) during the scanning process, allowing operators to capture both broad structural context at lower magnification and detailed flaw characteristics at higher magnification within the same inspection session.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The scanning process employs periodic alternation between low-magnification surveys and high-magnification detailed inspections. The system periodically switches zoom levels to first locate potential flaw regions at low magnification, then periodically zooms in for detailed characterization, creating a rhythmic inspection pattern that balances field of view and detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Measurement precision

If the specimen is positioned close to the X-ray source for geometric magnification, then spatial resolution improves, but the scanning trajectory becomes constrained and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial resolutionVSAvoidscanning trajectory
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a variable zoom mechanism as an intermediary between the fixed X-ray source and the specimen. This intermediary system allows magnification adjustment without requiring the specimen to be positioned extremely close to the source, thereby reducing mechanical constraints and simplifying the scanning trajectory while maintaining high spatial resolution through controlled zoom rather than purely geometric magnification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The variable zoom method significantly improves spatial resolution and defect detection accuracy in composite laminates, enabling the identification of smaller cracks and delaminations, particularly in through-the-thickness sections, outperforming conventional and limited-angle scanning techniques.

Implementation Method 1

emitting an X-ray beam from an X-ray source to project a region of interest (ROI) of a specimen within a field of view (FOV) onto a detector

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray: X-Ray

Data Source

PatentUS12130245B2Variable zoom X-ray computed tomography method for composites
Publication Date: 2024.10.29 BOARD OF RGT THE UNIV OF TEXAS SYST
  • US12130245B2 patent drawing
  • US12130245B2 patent drawing
  • US12130245B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A variable zoom X-ray CT method can significantly improve resolution for structures with large in-plane dimensions, for example to detect complex structural damage due to low-velocity impact in large thin composite laminate panels. The variable zoom method comprises emitting an X-ray beam from an X-ray source to project a region of interest (ROI) of a specimen within a field of view (FOV) onto a detector. Projections of the ROI are scanned with the detector while rotating the specimen about a rotational axis of a specimen stage and translating the specimen stage along an acquisition trajectory between the X-ray source and the detector. The acquisition trajectory specifies a source-to-object distance (SOD) between the X-ray source and the rotational axis of the specimen stage at each rotation angle of the specimen stage. A reconstruction computer reconstructs a three-dimensional volume of the specimen from the projections scanned by the detector.