Variant Demand Object Generation from Parts Lists

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In the supply chain management, suppliers face challenges in determining product variants from parts lists received from manufacturers, leading to inefficient manufacturing and delivery scheduling, especially when multiple product variants are involved.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that receive a product parts list, update a bill of material with the parts and selection conditions, determine the characteristic and characteristic values of the parts, and generate a variant demand object to identify and calculate demand on product variants, enabling efficient production planning and scheduling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual determination of product variants is used, then flexibility in handling diverse orders is maintained, but time consumption and inefficiency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder processing efficiencyVSAvoidtime for determining product variants
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of determining product variants with an automated computer-based system. The system automatically receives parts lists, queries the bill of material database, determines product variants, and generates production plans, eliminating the need for manual intervention and significantly improving processing efficiency while reducing time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by automatically processing orders without manual intervention. The automated system receives parts lists, independently queries the bill of material, determines product variants, and generates production plans, allowing the system to serve itself and eliminating dependency on manual operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If product-based planning is implemented, then manufacturing efficiency improves, but the complexity of transforming parts lists to product lists increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing scheduling efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity for parts-to-product transformation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a bill of material database as an intermediary between parts lists and product-based planning. The database stores predefined relationships between parts and product variants, allowing the system to automatically transform parts lists into product plans by querying the intermediary database, thereby managing complexity through structured data organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the complex transformation process into distinct modular steps: receiving parts lists, querying the bill of material database, determining product variants, and generating production plans. This segmentation allows each step to be handled independently and systematically, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If accurate product variant determination is achieved, then delivery schedule reliability improves, but manual processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery schedule accuracyVSAvoidautomation level in variant determination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual variant determination with an automated computer-based system that ensures accurate product variant identification. The automated system consistently applies the bill of material relationships to determine variants, eliminating human error and improving delivery schedule reliability while maximizing automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by automatically verifying product variant determinations against the bill of material database. The automated validation ensures that determined variants accurately reflect the ordered parts, providing continuous feedback to maintain high reliability in delivery schedules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8024059B2Method and system for determining a demand on a product variant using bill of material
Publication Date: 2011.09.20 SAP SE
  • US8024059B2 patent drawing
  • US8024059B2 patent drawing
  • US8024059B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a method and system for receiving a product parts list containing parts for creating a product variant of a product and updating a bill of material with the parts and a selection condition to identify a part of the product variant. The method includes determining a characteristic and a characteristic value of the parts of the product variant and generating a variant demand object for the product variant.