Variational Autoencoder for Medical Image Anomaly Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current medical imaging technologies face inefficiencies due to the need for manual identification and discarding of poor-quality scan images, which are often caused by patient movement during scans, leading to inefficiencies and human error in clinical decision-making.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using a variational autoencoder to classify medical images by generating attribute distributions that distinguish between normal and abnormal images, determining marginal likelihood, and comparing it to a predetermined threshold to automate the identification of anomaly images.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual identification of anomaly images is performed by technicians, then human error can be detected, but the process is slow and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of anomaly detectionVSAvoidspeed of anomaly detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automatic self-service anomaly detection through the variational autoencoder model that independently evaluates images without human intervention. The model processes images through encoding, latent space transformation, and decoding to generate reconstruction errors that automatically identify anomalies, eliminating the need for manual technician review while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If poor quality images are discarded and rescanned, then image quality standards are maintained, but significant time is lost due to rescan requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage quality standard complianceVSAvoidtime lost to rescanning
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary quality assessment by analyzing images immediately after acquisition using the variational autoencoder model. By detecting anomalies before clinical use, the system prevents the need for rescanning by identifying problematic images in advance, allowing for proactive quality control that maintains standards while minimizing time loss through early detection rather than post-acquisition discovery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If manual review of all images is performed, then all anomaly images can be identified, but the process is time-consuming and reduces overall workflow efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of anomaly identificationVSAvoidtime required for manual review
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and isolates only the anomalous images from the bulk dataset using the variational autoencoder's automatic detection capability. By taking out only the problematic images that require attention rather than reviewing all images manually, the system maintains complete anomaly identification while dramatically reducing the time investment required, as technicians only need to review the small subset of detected anomalies rather than every image in the dataset.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS11545255B2Systems and methods for classifying an anomaly medical image using variational autoencoder
Publication Date: 2023.01.03 SHANGHAI UNITED IMAGING INTELLIGENCE CO LTD
  • US11545255B2 patent drawing
  • US11545255B2 patent drawing
  • US11545255B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for classifying an image. For example, a method includes: inputting a medical image into a recognition model, the recognition model configured to: generate one or more attribute distributions that are substantially Gaussian when inputted with a normal image; and generate one or more attribute distributions that are substantially non-Gaussian when inputted with an abnormal image; generating, by the recognition model, one or more attribute distributions corresponding to medical image; generating a marginal likelihood corresponding to the likelihood of a sample image substantially matching the medical image, the sample image generated by sampling, by a generative model, the one or more attribute distributions; and generating a classification by at least: if the marginal likelihood is greater than or equal to a predetermined likelihood threshold, determining the image to be normal; and if the marginal likelihood is less than the predetermined likelihood threshold, determining the image to be abnormal.