Variational Constraint Server for 3D CAD Modeling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional CAD systems rely on parametric methods that are inadequate for solving complex geometric problems, limiting their ability to handle variational constraints and design analysis effectively, especially in 3D modeling and tolerance analysis.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that applies variational constraints to both 2D and 3D objects within a 3D space, allowing for the modification of these objects to satisfy geometric and functional properties, including the use of tolerance analysis and physics-based constraints, enabling enhanced 3D modeling and design optimization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If parametric methods are used in conventional CAD systems, then the system structure is simple and ease of operation is maintained, but the ability to solve complex geometric problems and handle variational constraints is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to handle variational constraintsVSAvoidsystem structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from traditional parametric modeling to variational modeling, fundamentally changing the mathematical parameters and solution methods. The constraint server now handles variational constraints with continuous adjustment capabilities, allowing geometric parameters to vary continuously while maintaining constraint satisfaction, thereby solving complex geometric problems that were intractable with conventional parametric methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces dynamic adjustment capabilities where geometric parameters and constraints can be continuously modified and re-evaluated. The constraint server dynamically solves systems of equations as parameters change, enabling real-time adaptation to variational constraints while maintaining model integrity, thus resolving the contradiction between adaptability and system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If conventional constraint servers are used, then the system is easy to operate, but the ability to perform tolerance analysis and force analysis is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetolerance analysis capabilityVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The constraint server is enhanced to perform multiple functions: geometric constraint solving, tolerance analysis, and force analysis. By integrating these diverse analytical capabilities into a single unified system, the patent achieves multi-functionality that improves reliability for complex analyses while maintaining a single point of access that preserves ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The constraint server acts as an intermediary between the user and complex analytical computations. It provides a unified interface that abstracts the complexity of tolerance and force analyses, allowing users to perform these advanced analyses without directly managing the underlying computational complexity, thus maintaining ease of operation while improving analytical reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If special-case adaptation methods are used, then specific geometric problems can be solved, but the manufacturing precision and general applicability are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometric problem solving accuracyVSAvoidgeneral applicability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the constraint solving process into distinct computational modules within the constraint server, each handling specific types of geometric problems and constraint types. This modular segmentation allows the system to apply specialized solution methods for different geometric problems while maintaining a unified interface, thereby achieving high precision for specific problems without sacrificing general applicability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9384591B23D design and modeling system and methods
Publication Date: 2016.07.05 ENVENTIVE ENG
  • US9384591B2 patent drawing
  • US9384591B2 patent drawing
  • US9384591B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-aided design (CAD) system provides for designing, modeling and simulating objects in 3D. Both 2D and 3D objects can be provided in a 3D space and associated to one another by one or more constraints. Modification to the objects is calculated to satisfy the constraints as well as the geometric and functional properties of the objects. The objects can then be updated according to the calculated modification, thereby satisfying various requirements of the design.