Variator Lever Control with Damper for Roller Load Balancing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Variators with a single roller control mechanism suffer from unequal load sharing between rollers due to manufacturing tolerances, leading to speed mismatches and resulting in poor performance and excessive wear, along with unwanted vibrations.

Innovation Solution

A variator design incorporating a lever control part that allows both rotation and translation, with a damper to dampen translation movements, ensuring balanced load distribution between rollers and reducing vibrations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single roller control mechanism is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but unequal load sharing between rollers occurs leading to poor performance and excessive wear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroller control mechanismVSAvoidload sharing between rollers
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control mechanism is segmented into separate control paths for each roller. Each roller has its own control arm (22a, 22b) that can independently adjust the roller position and tilt angle, allowing each roller to be controlled individually rather than through a single shared mechanism. This segmentation enables equal load sharing while maintaining reasonable device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control mechanism allows independent adjustment of multiple parameters for each roller: the position along the circular path (controlled by radial translation of control arms) and the tilt angle (controlled by rotation of control arms). By independently adjusting these parameters for each roller, the system can equalize load distribution while maintaining a relatively simple mechanical structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If manufacturing tolerances are present, then the ease of manufacture is improved, but speed mismatches between rollers occur resulting in poor performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroller assemblyVSAvoidspeed ratio matching
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control mechanism enables each roller to self-adjust its position and tilt angle to achieve equal load sharing and matched speed ratios. The independent control arms allow each roller to find its optimal position automatically based on the mechanical constraints and load distribution, compensating for manufacturing tolerances without requiring high-precision manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a static, fixed-position roller arrangement to a dynamic system where each roller can independently adjust its position and orientation. The control arms provide degrees of freedom that allow rollers to dynamically adapt to manufacturing variations and achieve optimal performance through self-adjustment during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If rollers are constrained to fixed positions, then the device complexity is reduced, but unwanted vibrations occur due to inability to balance load

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroller positioning systemVSAvoidvibrations
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The positioning system is segmented into independent control mechanisms for each roller, allowing individual adjustment of position and tilt angle. This segmentation enables the system to actively counteract vibrations by allowing rollers to move to positions that balance load distribution, rather than being constrained to fixed positions that may cause unbalanced forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows dynamic changes in roller position parameters (angular position along circular path and tilt angle) to counteract harmful vibrations. By adjusting these parameters independently for each roller, the system can achieve vibration reduction through balanced load distribution while maintaining a relatively simple mechanical control structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively balances load sharing between rollers and minimizes unwanted vibrations, enhancing the performance and longevity of the variator by allowing rollers to adjust their positions for equal load distribution and dampening oscillatory movements.

Implementation Method 1

a damper to damp translation of the control part

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDamping: Damping

Data Source

PatentUS8764605B2Variator
Publication Date: 2014.07.01 ALLISON TRANSMISSION INC
  • US8764605B2 patent drawing
  • US8764605B2 patent drawing
  • US8764605B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Variators that include a damped roller control part.