Varying Quantum Well Thickness for InGaN LED Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Optoelectronic semiconductor chips face inefficiencies in charge carrier distribution and emission spectrum broadening at elevated current densities due to poor charge carrier mobility and non-homogeneous energy levels in InGaN-based quantum wells, leading to reduced efficiency and unwanted wavelength changes.

Innovation Solution

A semiconductor layer sequence with N successive quantum wells separated by barrier layers, where the quantum wells exhibit varying emission wavelengths at different current densities, allowing for adjustable charge carrier distribution and emission energies to control efficiency across a wide current and temperature range, with specific thicknesses and indium content variations in the quantum wells and barrier layers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional InGaN-based quantum wells are used with uniform structure, then manufacturing is simple, but charge carrier distribution becomes non-uniform and emission spectrum broadens at elevated current densities

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveefficiencyVSAvoidquantum well structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by varying the thickness of individual quantum wells within the active zone. Specifically, quantum wells have different thicknesses (e.g., 2-6 nm) to create different energy levels and emission wavelengths. This local variation in structure allows different regions of the active zone to handle different current density ranges optimally, maintaining uniform charge carrier distribution and preventing emission spectrum broadening even at elevated current densities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If current density is increased to improve output, then productivity increases, but efficiency decreases due to poor charge carrier mobility and non-homogeneous energy levels

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveoutputVSAvoidefficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically varying the thickness of quantum wells to create a distribution of energy levels. This parameter variation allows the active zone to maintain efficient charge carrier distribution across a wide range of current densities. The different quantum well thicknesses create overlapping emission spectra that compensate for the broadening effects at high current densities, thereby maintaining efficiency while enabling high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If quantum wells have uniform thickness and composition, then manufacturing precision is easier to achieve, but emission wavelengths change unwantedly with current density

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantum well uniformityVSAvoidemission wavelength stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by intentionally creating non-uniform quantum well thicknesses within the active zone. Each quantum well has a specific thickness designed to emit at a particular wavelength range. This local differentiation ensures that the collective emission from all quantum wells remains stable across varying current densities, as different thicknesses compensate for the broadening effects that would otherwise cause unwanted wavelength shifts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If multiple quantum wells with different energy levels are used to improve efficiency, then adaptability increases, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveefficiencyVSAvoidactive zone structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the active zone into multiple discrete quantum wells, each with a specific thickness and energy level. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each quantum well's contribution to the overall emission. The segmented structure maintains efficiency across wide current density ranges while keeping the fabrication process relatively simple by using standard quantum well growth techniques with controlled thickness variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables higher efficiency and more uniform emission patterns over a large range of current densities and temperatures by adjusting charge carrier distribution and emission energies, reducing losses and broadening of emission spectra.

Implementation Method 1

the active zone includes N successive quantum wells along a growth direction (G) with N≧2 and N∈N, which each generate radiation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectroluminescence: Electroluminescence

Data Source

PatentUS9553231B2Semiconductor layer sequence and method of operating an optoelectronic semiconductor chip
Publication Date: 2017.01.24 OSRAM OLED
  • US9553231B2 patent drawing
  • US9553231B2 patent drawing
  • US9553231B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The semiconductor layer sequence includes an n-conductive layer, a p-conductive layer and an active zone located therebetween. The active zone comprises N quantum wells with N≧2. At a first working point (W1) at a first current density, the quantum wells have a first emission wavelength and, at a second working point (W2) at a second current density, a second emission wavelength. At least two of the first emission wavelengths differ from one another and at least some of the second emission wavelengths differ from the first emission wavelengths. The first current density is smaller than the second current density and the current densities differ from one another at least by a factor of 2.