Vascular Closure Grasping Member with Radial Fingers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for closing vascular access sites after minimally invasive procedures are inefficient, often requiring prolonged patient immobilization and risk of clot formation, especially with manual pressure or suture-based closure techniques which can be challenging in limited access surgeries.

Innovation Solution

A device comprising a grasping member with radially expandable fingers and a sheath that collapses to gather tissue around the access site, allowing for rapid and minimally invasive closure without piercing the vessel wall, using biocompatible materials and optional features like teeth and grooves for secure grasping, and an anchor member for enhanced closure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-generated harmful factors

If manual pressure is applied to close the vascular access site, then blood loss is minimized, but procedure time increases significantly and patient mobility is restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblood lossVSAvoidprocedure time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The closure device utilizes the patient's own vascular tissue to achieve closure. The grasping member captures and compresses the puncture site using forces generated by the device itself, eliminating the need for prolonged manual pressure application by medical personnel while maintaining hemostasis effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the manual mechanical compression method with a device-based mechanical system. The grasping member with compressible elements provides controlled mechanical force to close the puncture site, substituting the need for manual pressure application and extending arm limitations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If sutures are used to close larger vascular access sites, then closure effectiveness is improved, but surgical skill requirement and procedure complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosure effectivenessVSAvoidsurgical skill requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The closure device performs the closure function autonomously without requiring surgical suturing skills. The grasping member automatically captures and compresses the puncture site, eliminating the need for physicians to perform complex suture techniques while maintaining reliable closure effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts the complex suture technique requirement from the closure process and replaces it with a simpler device-based compression mechanism. The grasping member with its compressible elements performs the closure function that previously required skilled suturing, separating the closure function from surgical skill dependency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Stability of the object's composition

If the grasping member is made more rigid for stable tissue grasping, then grasping stability is improved, but trauma to the vessel wall increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrasping stabilityVSAvoidvessel wall trauma
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The compressible elements of the grasping member change their mechanical parameters dynamically. They provide rigid structural support for stable grasping when needed, but can compress or deform to accommodate and protect the vessel wall, adjusting their mechanical properties to balance stability with tissue protection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The grasping member utilizes composite construction with elements that combine rigidity for stable grasping with compliant features for tissue protection. The compressible elements may incorporate materials or structures that provide both structural integrity and gentle contact with the vessel wall, reducing trauma while maintaining grasping stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS9192362B2Device and method for closure of vessel access site
Publication Date: 2015.11.24 COOK MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US9192362B2 patent drawing
  • US9192362B2 patent drawing
  • US9192362B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device for closure of an opening formed in a body vessel includes a grasping member and a sheath movable thereover. The grasping member comprises a tubular body having a plurality of grasping fingers extending from a distal end of the tubular body. The fingers radially extend from the tubular body at a first angle, and are collapsible therefrom to a second angle. The fingers have a distal tip configured for grasping an outer wall of the body vessel surrounding the vessel opening when the fingers are at the first angle. The sheath is slidable over the tubular body and at least a portion of the grasping fingers for collapsing the fingers from the first angle to the second angle, thereby causing the collapsed fingers to at least substantially close the opening.