Vascular Implant Locking Structure for Stable Axial Delivery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vascular implant delivery systems face challenges in maintaining stable delivery due to unpredictable friction, leading to dislodgement of the implant during minimally invasive procedures, affecting surgical outcomes.

Innovation Solution

A vascular implant with a detachable engagement structure, comprising retention lugs and a delivery shaft with corresponding engagement members, allows for axial locking and unlocking, ensuring stable delivery by preventing dislodgement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If static friction is used to engage the vascular implant with the delivery shaft, then the implant can be delivered within the delivery sheath, but the implant is likely to dislodge due to uncontrollable friction magnitude

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery operationVSAvoidengagement stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the static friction-based mechanical engagement system with a mechanical interlocking system consisting of engagement protrusions on the delivery shaft and corresponding engagement grooves on the vascular implant. This substitution provides deterministic mechanical retention that prevents implant dislodge ment while maintaining delivery operability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the engagement mechanism from friction-dependent (variable parameter) to geometric-interlock-dependent (fixed parameter). The engagement protrusions and grooves are designed with specific dimensions and tolerances that ensure reliable engagement regardless of friction variations, thus controlling the engagement stability parameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If the vascular implant is contracted and sleeved over the delivery shaft without mechanical connection, then delivery is simplified, but axial stability is lost and dislodgement occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengagement structureVSAvoidaxial stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the simple friction-based mechanical system with a structured interlocking system featuring engagement protrusions and grooves. This substitution adds geometric complexity but provides deterministic axial stability through mechanical interlocking rather than relying on friction alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The engagement interface is segmented into discrete engagement protrusions and corresponding grooves distributed along the implant and delivery shaft. This segmentation provides multiple engagement points that collectively enhance axial stability while maintaining overall structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3991699B1Vascular implant, delivery device and medical apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.11.26 MICROPORT NEUROTECH SHANGHAI
  • EP3991699B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2a
  • EP3991699B1 patent drawingFigure 2b~3b
  • EP3991699B1 patent drawingFigure 3c~4

AI summary

A vascular implant, a delivery device and a medical apparatus are disclosed. During delivery of the vascular implant, the vascular implant is maintained axially stationary relative to a delivery shaft (4), thus preventing the dislodgement of the vascular implant and making the delivery more stable. The vascular implant includes a first engagement structure, and the delivery device includes the delivery shaft (4) and a chamber. The delivery shaft (4) includes a second engagement structure configured for detachable retaining engagement with the first engagement structure. Both the first engagement structure and the delivery shaft (4) are configured to be received in the chamber. When the first engagement structure and the delivery shaft (4) are received in the chamber, the first engagement structure is confined by the chamber and thus remains in retaining engagement with the second engagement structure, thus axially locking the vascular implant to the delivery shaft (4). When the first engagement structure is removed from the chamber, it is no longer confined thereby and is thus detachable from the second engagement structure, thus axially unlocking the vascular implant from the delivery shaft (4).