Vascular Tree Segmentation Using ML Image Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vascular imaging techniques suffer from low contrast and complex environments, leading to error-prone vascular segmentation and feature identification, especially in arterial stenosis assessment, which often requires invasive procedures.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing machine learning models, such as convolutional neural networks, to select an optimal angiographic image from a sequence based on cardiac phase and image quality, enhancing vascular image contrast and reducing errors by analyzing segmentation masks for size and clarity scores.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated vascular segmentation is performed, then time and effort required for manual identification is reduced, but the output becomes error-prone due to low contrast and complex environment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevascular segmentation speedVSAvoidsegmentation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the vascular image processing into distinct stages: initial automated segmentation to identify potential vascular regions, followed by secondary verification steps to confirm and refine the segmentation results. This multi-stage segmentation approach maintains high productivity while improving reliability by catching errors at different processing stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where segmentation results are continuously evaluated and refined. The system provides feedback loops that allow automated correction of segmentation errors, with the ability to iteratively improve segmentation accuracy by analyzing contrast variations and environmental complexity in different vascular regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If manual vascular identification is performed, then segmentation accuracy is improved, but time and skill requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevascular feature identification accuracyVSAvoidmanual analysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing automated pre-segmentation and feature detection before manual review. This prepares the data in advance by identifying likely vascular regions and characteristics, so that when manual verification is needed, the operator starts with pre-processed information rather than raw images, significantly reducing the time and skill burden while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Illumination intensity

If image contrast is low, then vascular features are difficult to distinguish, but increasing contrast may amplify noise and extraneous features

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevascular image contrastVSAvoidnoise and extraneous features
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by implementing contrast enhancement that is spatially adaptive - different regions of the image receive different contrast adjustments based on local characteristics. Vascular regions receive enhanced contrast to improve visibility, while regions prone to noise amplification receive more conservative processing. This localized approach maintains vascular feature distinguishability without uniformly amplifying noise across the entire image.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20260087624A1System and method for machine-learning based sensor analysis and vascular tree segmentation
Publication Date: 2026.03.26 CATHWORKS LTD
  • US20260087624A1 patent drawing
  • US20260087624A1 patent drawing
  • US20260087624A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods for automated identification of vascular features are described. In some embodiments, one or more machine learning (ML)-based vascular classifiers are used, with their results being combined to with results of at least one other vascular classifier in order to produce the final results. Potentially advantages of this approach include the ability to combine certain strengths of ML classifiers with segmentation approaches based on more classical (“formula-based”) methods. These strengths may include particularly the identification of anatomically identified targets mixed within an image also showing similar looking but anatomically distinct targets.