VAT Liquidity Builder for Order Execution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Retail investors face challenges in executing large orders due to high frequency trading, while institutional investors lack incentives to participate with retail investors, leading to liquidity issues across alternative trading systems.

Innovation Solution

A Volume Attentive Trade (VAT) Liquidity Builder system that aggregates and coordinates retail and institutional orders, prioritizing large orders and maintaining confidentiality to avoid market disruption, using a dynamic platform that continuously compares and matches orders to facilitate efficient trade execution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If retail investors place large orders publicly, then they can execute trades, but high frequency traders detect and front-run these orders, resulting in worse execution prices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrade execution speedVSAvoidexecution price quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary system (the trading platform with volume analysis algorithms) that mediates between retail investors and high frequency traders. This intermediary detects large order patterns and strategically routes them through multiple mechanisms (dark pools, fragmented execution, timing optimization) to prevent front-running while maintaining execution capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments large retail orders into multiple smaller component orders that are executed separately through different channels and time periods. This segmentation prevents high frequency traders from detecting the full order size and front-running the entire position, while still achieving complete execution over time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If retail investors split large orders into smaller orders, then they avoid detection by high frequency traders, but they experience timing issues and lose preferred trading prices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder confidentialityVSAvoidtrade execution timing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs feedback mechanisms where volume analysis algorithms continuously monitor market conditions, order execution results, and price movements. This feedback enables dynamic adjustment of subsequent order routing decisions, timing strategies, and segmentation patterns to optimize both confidentiality and execution timing based on real-time market state

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic order execution strategies that adapt to changing market conditions. The system dynamically adjusts order timing, routing choices, and segmentation patterns based on real-time volume analysis, market depth, and price movements, rather than using static predetermined splitting schedules

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If institutional investors trade on alternative trading systems, then they can execute large orders confidentially, but liquidity is reduced across the system

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder execution confidentialityVSAvoidmarket liquidity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal trading platform that serves multiple functions and participant types simultaneously. It handles both retail and institutional orders, provides both public and confidential execution pathways, and maintains liquidity across multiple venues while enabling confidential large-order execution through coordinated multi-venue routing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If high frequency traders offer slightly better prices to front-run retail orders, then they execute their trades first, but this creates a race condition that increases market volatility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrader execution speedVSAvoidmarket price stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of order characteristics, volume patterns, and market conditions before execution. By pre-identifying large retail orders and pre-planning execution strategies (routing to dark pools, fragmenting orders, selecting optimal timing), it prevents the race condition from developing in the first place, thereby maintaining price stability while still enabling efficient execution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10817943B2Volume attentive trade liquidity builder
Publication Date: 2020.10.27 THE BARTLEY J MADDEN FOUND
  • US10817943B2 patent drawing
  • US10817943B2 patent drawing
  • US10817943B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are described for aggregating and filling Volume Attentive Trade (VAT) orders using a VAT Liquidity Builder. As described, in various aspects a first grouping of VAT orders may be aggregated by the VAT Liquidity Builder. A second grouping of VAT orders may also be aggregated by the VAT Liquidity Builder. Each of the VAT orders for the first and second groups may each include a set of VAT rules that define a limit price, a share quantity and a VAT delta. The VAT Liquidity Builder may then generate an effective limit price for each of the first group of VAT orders using the corresponding limit prices and VAT deltas, and generate an execution command to fill a particular VAT order having the largest share quantity from the second group of VAT orders with one or more qualifying VAT orders from the first group.