VCSEL Bottom Mirror Design for Temperature-Stable Slope Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Vertical Cavity Surface Emitting Lasers (VCSELs) experience fluctuation in slope efficiency with temperature changes, making it difficult to predict their performance accurately due to varying reflectivity and absorption in mirror layers, which affects data transmission rates in optical networks.

Innovation Solution

The VCSEL design incorporates a bottom mirror with a greater increase in contrast ratio and reflectance compared to the top mirror as temperature increases, and reduces the number of mirror pairs in the bottom mirror to stabilize slope efficiency, while selecting specific mirror layer compositions to minimize top mirror reflectivity and maximize bottom mirror reflectivity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If the number of mirror pairs in the bottom mirror is increased to maximize reflectivity at room temperature, then the reflectivity is improved, but the slope efficiency fluctuation with temperature increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemirror reflectivityVSAvoidslope efficiency stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by reducing the number of mirror pairs in the bottom mirror from the optimal number (e.g., 30-35 pairs) to a reduced number (e.g., 20-25 pairs). This parameter change allows the bottom mirror reflectivity to increase with temperature at a greater rate than the top mirror, compensating for temperature-induced wavelength shifts and stabilizing slope efficiency across the operating temperature range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Power

If the VCSEL is designed for maximum gain at room temperature, then the optical output is improved, but the performance prediction accuracy deteriorates due to temperature sensitivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical outputVSAvoidperformance prediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies inversion by reversing the conventional design approach. Instead of maximizing room temperature reflectivity, the design intentionally uses fewer mirror pairs to create a bottom mirror that is less reflective at room temperature but increases in reflectivity more rapidly with temperature. This inverted approach compensates for the natural decrease in top mirror reflectivity with temperature, achieving stable slope efficiency and improved performance predictability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in a relatively stable slope efficiency over a desired temperature range, reducing fluctuations and maintaining performance consistency, thereby simplifying system design and operation.

Implementation Method 1

As light passes from a layer of one index of refraction to another, a portion of the light is reflected. By using a sufficient number of alternating layers, a high percentage of light can be reflected by the mirror.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

Optical gain occurs when photons in the active region stimulate electrons to recombine with holes in the conduction band to the valance band which produces additional photons.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStimulated emission: Light

Data Source

PatentUS7606282B2Optimizing VCSEL mirrors for improving temperature response
Publication Date: 2009.10.20 II VI DELAWARE INC
  • US7606282B2 patent drawing
  • US7606282B2 patent drawing
  • US7606282B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Improved slope efficiency in a VCSEL can be accomplished by selecting particular mirror layer compositions and/or mirror layer configurations that minimize increased reflectivity in the top mirror and/or maximize increased reflectivity of the bottom mirror with increasing temperature. Improved reflectivity of the bottom mirror compared to the top mirror over a desired operating temperature range can be facilitated by (i) selecting mirror pairs for the bottom and/or top mirror that gives the bottom mirror pairs a greater increase in contrast ratio with increasing temperature compared to the top-mirror pairs, and/or (ii) including fewer mirror pairs in the bottom mirror than the number of mirror pairs that would give optimal reflectivity.