Visual Descent Point Calculation for Non-Precision Approaches

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Pilots executing non-precision instrument landings face challenges when the Visual Descent Point (VDP) is not published, leading to increased workload, potential human errors, and risks of steep diving, obstacle collisions, and early descent below the Minimum Descent Altitude (MDA).

Innovation Solution

A method and system that calculate the VDP based on runway altitude data and MDA, using a processor to determine a target downward acceptable glidepath angle, and output alerts via an aircraft display, including symbology on flight plan paths, to guide pilots safely to the runway, while also considering terrain and obstacle data to prevent collisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If pilots calculate VDP manually when not published, then they can obtain descent guidance, but it increases workload and can induce human errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of VDP determinationVSAvoidpilot workload
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by automatically calculating and displaying the VDP using onboard navigation equipment and database information, eliminating the need for manual pilot calculation and reducing workload while maintaining accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual calculation methods are replaced with automated electronic computation systems that use processors to calculate VDP based on stored approach procedure data, substituting human mental computation with reliable machine calculation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If pilots manually calculate and execute VDP, then descent guidance is available, but it increases the risk of steep diving and inability to pull up

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of descent profileVSAvoidcomplexity of descent control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides continuous feedback to pilots through visual display of the calculated VDP position and glide path guidance, enabling real-time monitoring and adjustment of descent rate to maintain safe flight parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The VDP is pre-calculated and displayed before the pilot needs to execute the descent, allowing advance planning and preparation of the descent profile, reducing last-minute decision-making complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of information

If pilots manually determine VDP without published data, then descent information is obtained, but human errors in calculations may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of VDP dataVSAvoidsimplicity of VDP acquisition
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The navigation system automatically retrieves and calculates VDP information using onboard computers and database, eliminating manual calculation steps where human errors could occur while providing accurate descent guidance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual calculation processes are replaced with automated electronic computation that retrieves approach data from the avionics database and calculates VDP using programmed algorithms, eliminating human calculation errors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If early descent below MDA is performed, then landing may be achieved sooner, but risk of impacting terrain and obstacles increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of landing processVSAvoidrisk of terrain and obstacle impact
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-calculates the optimal descent profile and VDP position based on approach data and aircraft performance, providing advance guidance that ensures safe descent rate and timing to avoid terrain and obstacles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Continuous monitoring and display of descent parameters relative to the calculated VDP and glide path provide real-time feedback to pilots, enabling adjustment of descent rate to maintain safe clearance from terrain and obstacles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11676499B2Methods and systems for alerting a visual descent point (VDP)
Publication Date: 2023.06.13 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US11676499B2 patent drawing
  • US11676499B2 patent drawing
  • US11676499B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and system for alerting a Visual Decent Point (VDP) in an aircraft system. The methods and systems retrieve runway altitude data and Minimum Descent Altitude (MDA) data from an avionics database for a target runway. Data in the avionics database for the target runway does not include a published VDP. The method includes calculating the VDP based on a difference between the runway altitude data and the MDA so as to achieve a target downward acceptable glidepath angle during final descent from the MDA to the target runway. The method includes outputting an alert of the VDP by an output device of the aircraft system.