Additive Manufacturing Using Vector Fields and Texture Maps

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Additive manufacturing systems face challenges in accurately replicating objects with varying physical properties across different areas, requiring complex input parameters and high technical expertise, making it difficult for lay users to efficiently manufacture accurate replica objects with anisotropic properties.

Innovation Solution

A method that generates a three-dimensional representation of a target object using domain values such as point clouds, curves, splines, vector fields, and texture maps to describe anisotropic behavior, allowing for the propagation of bodies with optimized parameters to match the object's physical properties, and instructs additive manufacturing systems to produce objects based on this representation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If complex input parameters and calculations are used to accurately represent target objects, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity and ease of operation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of physical propertiesVSAvoidcomplexity of input parameters
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses texture maps as simplified digital copies that encode physical property information. Instead of requiring users to input complex physical parameters directly, the system copies the appearance and texture information from reference images, which are then automatically processed to generate the required manufacturing data for accurate physical property replication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces texture maps as an intermediary between the user and the complex manufacturing parameters. Users provide simple texture map inputs rather than complex physical property specifications, and the system automatically processes these maps through algorithms to generate the detailed manufacturing data needed for accurate physical property replication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If complex input parameters and calculations are used to accurately represent target objects, then manufacturing precision is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of physical propertiesVSAvoiduser accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system copies visual texture information from reference images to represent physical properties. Users simply provide texture maps rather than complex physical parameter inputs, making the system accessible to users without specialized knowledge while maintaining manufacturing precision through automated processing of these simplified inputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Manufacturing precision

If individual areas are printed separately to achieve varying physical properties, then manufacturing precision is improved, but productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of varying physical propertiesVSAvoidmanufacturing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by using texture maps that encode spatially varying physical properties across different regions of the object. Each area's physical characteristics are defined locally within the texture map, allowing the system to print the entire object in a single operation while maintaining accurate varying physical properties throughout different regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple individual area print operations into a single printing process. By encoding all the physical property information for different areas within unified texture maps and using automated path generation, the system combines what would have been separate printing operations into one efficient process that maintains manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Ease of operation

If simplified input methods are used, then ease of operation is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser accessibilityVSAvoidaccuracy of physical properties
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex manual parameter input with automated image processing algorithms. Texture maps are automatically processed through computational algorithms that extract physical property information and generate manufacturing data, substituting manual mechanical input with automated computational processing to maintain precision while simplifying user interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses texture maps as simplified inputs that are automatically copied and processed. The texture map information is copied into the manufacturing data generation process, where automated algorithms extract and apply the physical property information, maintaining manufacturing precision without requiring users to directly input complex parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

5Ease of operation

If texture maps are used to define physical properties, then ease of operation is improved, but difficulty of detecting and measuring deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of inputVSAvoidcomplexity of processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual parameter specification with automated texture map processing. The system uses computational algorithms to automatically analyze texture maps and extract physical property information, substituting complex manual measurement and parameter detection with automated image processing and data extraction routines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11042671B1Methods of using vector fields and texture maps as inputs to design and manufacture composite objects with tunable properties
Publication Date: 2021.06.22 UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
  • US11042671B1 patent drawing
  • US11042671B1 patent drawing
  • US11042671B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods of optimizing additive manufacturing processes for improved efficiencies and accuracies, particularly by simplifying the user interface portions of the processes. The methods use path-finding calculations, such as vector fields, vector trails, and texture maps, to form accurate models from which replica composite objects can be printed, without requiring complex parameter inputs and calculations from the user. The methods measure and plot vector fields by considering the location of a particle within the volume of an object at various points of time to develop a strand-like model that is used to manufacture a replica object.