Selective Vector Graphics Video Delivery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Video distribution systems face challenges in managing network bandwidth and cost due to resource-intensive bitmap video content delivery in wireless communications networks, which is difficult to manage and costly for core and radio networks, operations, and customer care.

Innovation Solution

The system selectively communicates video content in either a vector graphics format or a bitmap graphics format, using a media server to determine the appropriate format based on factors like bandwidth usage, device capabilities, and geographic location, directing the content to either a vector or bitmap decoder accordingly, and allowing for premium high-quality bitmap delivery as an option.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If bitmap video content delivery is used in wireless communications networks, then video content can be delivered with standard compatibility, but network bandwidth consumption increases and management becomes resource-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevideo format compatibilityVSAvoidnetwork bandwidth consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the graphical format parameter from bitmap to vector based on device capabilities and network conditions. The media server detects whether a device supports vector graphics and selectively delivers vector or bitmap content accordingly, optimizing bandwidth usage while maintaining compatibility where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If bitmap video content is delivered to all devices, then universal compatibility is maintained, but network management complexity and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice compatibilityVSAvoidnetwork management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different content delivery strategies to different devices based on their capabilities. Instead of uniform delivery, the media server identifies device types (vector-capable vs. bitmap-only) and delivers appropriately formatted content to each segment, simplifying network management by targeting formats to specific device groups.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains bitmap content as a fallback or premium option while primarily using vector content. The media server manages multiple format versions of the same content and directs them to appropriate devices, effectively copying the content in the most efficient format for each device type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Loss of energy

If vector graphics format is used, then network bandwidth consumption is reduced, but device compatibility requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork bandwidth consumptionVSAvoiddevice capability requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes the delivery parameter based on detected device capabilities. The media server identifies whether a device supports vector graphics and adjusts the content format accordingly, ensuring vector delivery only when compatible devices are detected, thus reducing bandwidth without forcing incompatibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The content delivery system becomes dynamic rather than static. The media server continuously assesses device capabilities and network conditions, adjusting the format selection in real-time. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize bandwidth usage while maintaining compatibility by switching formats based on current device requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Manufacturing precision

If high-quality bitmap content is delivered as premium service, then user experience is improved for paying customers, but network resource allocation becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevideo qualityVSAvoidnetwork resource allocation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements local quality differentiation where premium bitmap content is delivered selectively to devices that request or require it, rather than uniformly to all users. The media server identifies premium users and directs them to high-quality bitmap content, while standard users receive optimized vector content, simplifying resource allocation through targeted delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10313765B2Selective communication of a vector graphics format version of a video content item
Publication Date: 2019.06.04 AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P
  • US10313765B2 patent drawing
  • US10313765B2 patent drawing
  • US10313765B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes receiving a first request for a video content item. The first request is received at a media server from a first electronic device. The method includes selectively communicating a vector graphics format version of the video content item or a bitmap graphics format version of the video content item to the first electronic device.