Vector Processing Stop Indicators for Memory Hazard Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Memory hazards, such as address hazards, restrict the exploitation of parallel processing features in modern high-performance processors, limiting instruction-level parallelism, data-level parallelism, and thread-level parallelism by preventing loads from being hoisted or vectorized loops from being spawned due to uncertainty in safely reordering memory operations.

Innovation Solution

A method for detecting conflicts between memory addresses in vectors during parallel operations, generating stop indicators for memory hazards, and producing predicate values to specify safe parallel execution of memory operations, allowing for the safe grouping of consecutive elements in vectors and mitigating the effects of memory hazards.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If loads are hoisted above stores to improve instruction-level parallelism, then processor performance is improved, but memory hazards may cause incorrect execution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstruction-level parallelismVSAvoidmemory hazard correctness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing memory hazard detection and generating stop indicators before executing the load hoisting operation. The system analyzes memory addresses in advance to identify potential hazards, then uses stop indicators to control the execution flow, ensuring that loads are only hoisted when safe to do so, thus maintaining both performance and correctness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If compilers conservatively avoid hoisting loads to prevent memory hazards, then execution correctness is maintained, but processor performance is greatly sacrificed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory hazard correctnessVSAvoidprocessor performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by using runtime memory address information to dynamically determine whether load hoisting is safe. The system monitors memory addresses during execution, compares them against stored hazard information, and adjusts the execution flow accordingly using stop indicators. This feedback mechanism allows the compiler to generate aggressive code while runtime feedback ensures correctness, resolving the contradiction between conservative compilation and performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If vectorizing loops is performed to improve data-level parallelism, then computational performance is improved, but memory hazards block vectorization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata-level parallelismVSAvoidmemory hazard safety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the vectorized loop into segments controlled by stop indicators. When memory hazards are detected, the vector operation is segmented such that certain iterations are executed separately or in a different order, while safe iterations can be vectorized efficiently. This segmentation allows the system to maintain data-level parallelism for safe operations while handling hazardous operations correctly, resolving the contradiction between vectorization and memory hazard safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If existing hardware mechanisms are used to prevent memory hazards, then correctness is maintained, but the mechanisms add complexity and limit parallelism exploitation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory hazard preventionVSAvoidhardware mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces stop indicators as an intermediary mechanism between the compiler and the execution hardware. Rather than requiring complex hardware mechanisms to track and prevent all memory hazards, the stop indicators serve as a simple intermediary that carries hazard information from the compiler through to the execution stage, enabling correct load hoisting and vectorization with minimal hardware overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8060728B2Generating stop indicators during vector processing
Publication Date: 2011.11.15 APPLE INC
  • US8060728B2 patent drawing
  • US8060728B2 patent drawing
  • US8060728B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for performing parallel operations in a computer system when one or more memory hazards may be present, which may be implemented by a processor, is described. During operation, the processor receives instructions for detecting conflict between memory addresses in vectors when operations are performed in parallel using at least a portion of the vectors, and generating one or more stop indicators corresponding to any detected conflict between the memory addresses, where a given stop indicator indicates a memory hazard. Next, the processor executes the instructions for detecting the conflict between the memory addresses and generating the one or more stop indicators.