Vector Sculpting Tool With Constraint Pre-Solving

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional vector graphics editing tools are inefficient and lack intuitive control, as they do not effectively support both free-form editing and high-level constraint enforcement, often resulting in inconsistent edits and constraint lock issues, which hinder precise manipulation of vector graphics.

Innovation Solution

A vector sculpting tool that enables free-form editing while approximately satisfying high-level constraints, using a constrained Sobolev-preconditioned gradient-descent method to update the vector graphics data structure, enforcing handle, binding, and continuity constraints, and prioritizing sculpting constraints to maintain structural relationships and user-friendly interaction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional vector graphics editing tools are used to manipulate control points individually, then basic transformations can be achieved, but the editing process becomes time consuming and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveediting efficiencyVSAvoidtime consumed for editing
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the editing process into constraint definition and free-form manipulation phases. Users define high-level constraints (e.g., alignment, symmetry, relative positioning) that automatically generate a system of equations, allowing subsequent edits to be performed through intuitive gestures rather than individual control point manipulation. This segmentation transforms complex multi-step editing into efficient single-step operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-calculating constraint relationships and generating a solved system of equations before the user performs editing operations. The constraint solver pre-processes the vector graphic data structure to establish mathematical relationships between control points, enabling real-time updates during free-form editing without requiring complex calculations during the actual editing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If high-level constraints are strictly enforced in vector graphics editing, then structural relationships are maintained, but editing flexibility is reduced and constraint lock issues occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstraint satisfactionVSAvoidediting flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic constraint enforcement through an iterative solver that adjusts constraint satisfaction based on editing context. During free-form editing, the solver dynamically balances between maintaining structural relationships and allowing editing flexibility by redistributing constraint violations across multiple control points. This dynamic approach prevents constraint lock by allowing temporary relaxation of individual constraints while maintaining overall structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by transforming geometric constraints into a system of mathematical equations with multiple degrees of freedom. Instead of enforcing constraints as rigid geometric rules, the system represents constraints as solvable equations that can be satisfied through parameter adjustments in the vector graphics data structure. This allows the solver to find optimal solutions that satisfy constraints while preserving editing flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If free-form editing is allowed without constraint enforcement, then editing flexibility is maintained, but structural relationships and design integrity are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveediting flexibilityVSAvoidstructural relationship consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback through an iterative constraint solving process that continuously monitors and adjusts control point positions during free-form editing. As users manipulate control points through gestures, the solver provides real-time feedback by calculating the minimal adjustments needed to maintain constraint satisfaction. This feedback loop ensures structural relationships are preserved while allowing flexible editing, as the system automatically compensates for deviations from desired geometric relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The constraint solver acts as an intermediary between user editing actions and the vector graphic data structure. Instead of directly applying user gestures to control points, the solver mediates by translating gestures into constraint-satisfying transformations. This intermediary layer ensures that free-form editing operations automatically maintain structural relationships by solving the system of constraint equations before updating the graphic, thus preserving design integrity while enabling flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Manufacturing precision

If multiple constraints are enforced simultaneously in vector graphics editing, then design precision is improved, but computational complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign precisionVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-assembling and pre-solving the system of constraint equations before editing operations begin. All geometric constraints (alignment, symmetry, relative positioning, etc.) are translated into mathematical equations and organized into a structured system that can be efficiently solved. This pre-processing reduces computational complexity during actual editing by avoiding repeated constraint analysis and enabling rapid updates through simple equation solving.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by transforming multiple geometric constraints into a unified system of mathematical equations with standardized forms. By representing diverse constraints (alignment, symmetry, spacing, etc.) as comparable equation types, the solver can efficiently process multiple constraints simultaneously using consistent algorithms. This parameter transformation reduces computational complexity by eliminating the need for specialized handling of each constraint type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11164355B1Shape aware transformation
Publication Date: 2021.11.02 ADOBE INC
  • US11164355B1 patent drawing
  • US11164355B1 patent drawing
  • US11164355B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for editing an image based on multiple constraints are described. Embodiments of the systems and methods may identify a change to a vector graphics data structure, generate an update for the vector graphics data structure based on strictly enforcing a handle constraint, a binding constraint, and a continuity constraint, adjust the vector graphics data structure sequentially for each of a plurality of sculpting constraints according to a priority ordering of the sculpting constraints, generate an additional update for the vector graphics data structure based on strictly enforcing the binding constraint and the continuity constraint and approximately enforcing the handle constraint and the sculpting constraints, adjust the vector graphics data structure sequentially for each of a plurality of sculpting constraints, and display the vector graphic based on the adjusted vector graphics data structure.