Vectorable Nozzle With Pivotable Triangular Panels For Thrust Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aircraft control surfaces are limited in effectiveness across varying flight conditions and increase radar vulnerability, necessitating a more efficient thrust vectoring system with low radar observability and variable nozzle areas for enhanced maneuverability and performance.

Innovation Solution

A vectorable nozzle design featuring convergent and divergent sections with pivotable panels that adjust to change the nozzle's throat and exit areas, allowing for thrust vectoring and maintaining a constant exit-to-throat area ratio, while minimizing radar reflection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If aircraft control surfaces (wing flaps, ailerons, vertical fins, rudders) are used to provide maneuverability, then aircraft control and maneuverability are improved, but radar signature increases making the aircraft more vulnerable to anti-aircraft fire and missiles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaircraft maneuverabilityVSAvoidradar signature
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the control function from traditional external control surfaces and relocates it to the exhaust nozzle system. By using vectorable nozzles with pivotable triangular panels, the aircraft achieves maneuverability through thrust vectoring rather than through control surfaces, thereby eliminating the radar signature problem while maintaining ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the mechanical control surface system (hinged surfaces requiring actuators and linkages) with a thrust vectoring nozzle system. The vectorable nozzle uses pivotable panels controlled by hydraulic or electric actuators to redirect exhaust flow, providing maneuverability through aerodynamic forces rather than mechanical surface deflection, thus reducing radar observability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If control surfaces are attached to the airframe with hinges, then control functionality is achieved, but the hinges and hinge lines reflect enemy radar amplifying the return

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol surface functionalityVSAvoidradar reflection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention removes the hinge mechanism entirely from the control system. Instead of hinged control surfaces that create radar reflections, the vectorable nozzle uses pivotable panels mounted on the nozzle body with pivot axes perpendicular to the nozzle centerline. This eliminates the hinge line radar reflection problem while maintaining control functionality through thrust vectoring

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention inverts the traditional approach by making the nozzle movable rather than the control surfaces. The pivotable triangular panels of the vectorable nozzle are rotated about pivot axes to change the exhaust flow direction, achieving control through inversion of the conventional mechanism and thereby eliminating radar-reflecting hinges

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If a vectorable nozzle with pivotable panels is used to reduce radar signature, then low radar observability is achieved, but device complexity increases due to multiple pivotable components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradar signatureVSAvoidnozzle structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vectorable nozzle is segmented into multiple independent pivotable triangular panels (left and right panels) that can be controlled independently. Each panel is a discrete component that can be pivoted about its own axis, allowing for simplified manufacturing, assembly, and maintenance while achieving complex thrust vectoring capabilities and reducing radar signature through the segmented structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of operation

If thrust vectoring is implemented to improve maneuverability, then aircraft maneuverability is enhanced, but the nozzle structure becomes more complex requiring variable throat and exit areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaircraft maneuverabilityVSAvoidnozzle structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vectorable nozzle incorporates dynamic elements including pivotable triangular panels that can rotate about pivot axes, and variable area capabilities through movable panels in the convergent and divergent sections. This allows the nozzle to adapt its geometry in real-time to optimize performance across different flight conditions while providing thrust vectoring for enhanced maneuverability, managing the complexity through dynamic adaptability rather than static over-engineering

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS7475548B2Vectorable nozzle with pivotable triangular panels
Publication Date: 2009.01.13 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • US7475548B2 patent drawing
  • US7475548B2 patent drawing
  • US7475548B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vectorable nozzle includes convergent and divergent sections and a throat therebetween. Heightwise spaced apart upper and lower walls outwardly bound a nozzle flowpath and extend aftwardly through the convergent and divergent sections from the nozzle inlet to the nozzle outlet. The upper wall includes triangular left and right side convergent upper panels pivotably mounted to a triangular convergent upper ramp in the convergent section along left and right side convergent angled hinge lines respectively. The upper wall further includes triangular left and right side divergent upper panels pivotably attached to a triangular divergent upper ramp in the divergent section along left and right side divergent angled hinge lines respectively. The left and right side convergent upper panels are in sealing engagement with the left and right side divergent upper panels along left and right side upper interfaces, respectively.