Vegetable Support Member with Curved Drainage Base for Plant Health

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional support methods for vegetable plants, such as wooden stakes and wire cages, fail to provide adequate support, leading to bent or broken stems, reduced air circulation, increased susceptibility to diseases and pests, and are labor-intensive, lacking adaptability to varying growth patterns.

Innovation Solution

A multifunctional gardening device with a vertical support member and vegetable support member featuring apertures, a curved base member with drainage apertures, cradles, and integrated tools like cutting edges and handles, allowing for flexible, robust support and easy maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional support methods (wooden stakes, wire cages) are used, then the structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but the support reliability is insufficient leading to bent or broken stems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport reliabilityVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The support member is divided into multiple segments that can be assembled together to form a complete support structure. Each segment can be manufactured separately and then connected to provide the full support function, resolving the contradiction between reliability and manufacturing simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The support member features a nested structure where one component fits within another, allowing for compact storage and easy assembly while providing robust support when deployed. This nested design maintains structural reliability without significantly increasing manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional support methods are used, then the device complexity is low, but the adaptability to varying growth patterns is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to growth patternsVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The support member incorporates dynamic elements that allow it to adjust and adapt to the varying growth patterns of plants. The structure can flex and reconfigure as plants grow, providing continuous adaptability without requiring complex mechanical systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The support member is designed with universal characteristics that allow it to accommodate different plant types and growth patterns. By integrating multiple functions into a single structure, it provides adaptability without proportionally increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If traditional support methods are used, then the ease of operation is moderate, but the labor intensity for setup and maintenance is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of setup and maintenanceVSAvoidlabor time for setup and maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The support member is designed to be pre-assembled or pre-configured, allowing for rapid deployment in the garden. Critical components are prepared in advance, significantly reducing the time and labor required during actual setup and maintenance operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The support member incorporates self-adjusting features that reduce the need for manual intervention during setup and maintenance. The structure can self-regulate or self-adjust to plant growth, minimizing the labor time required for ongoing care.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Object-affected harmful factors

If traditional support methods are used, then the device complexity is low, but the plant health protection is insufficient due to reduced air circulation and increased disease susceptibility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisease and pest susceptibilityVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The support member incorporates localized features that specifically address air circulation and disease prevention at critical points around the plant. By concentrating protective features where they are most needed, it effectively reduces disease susceptibility without requiring complex structures throughout the entire support system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances plant health by providing adaptable, efficient support that reduces damage and disease susceptibility, facilitates easier maintenance, and increases yield.

Implementation Method 1

At least one second aperture is defined on the bottom surface of the base member. The second aperture is configured to drain fluid through the base member.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDrainage:

Implementation Method 2

a downwardly angled recess is formed in the base member. The downwardly angled recess is configured to direct water into the at least one second aperture.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity-driven flow: Gravitation

Implementation Method 3

The downward projecting sidewall is configured to sheer thorns from a stem as the stem is pulled upwardly through the at least one second aperture.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear force: Shear Stress

Data Source

PatentUS20250255224A1Vegetable support apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.08.14 IERACI BRUNO
  • US20250255224A1 patent drawing
  • US20250255224A1 patent drawing
  • US20250255224A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A multifunctional gardening device designed to support includes a vegetable support member with a sidewall featuring at least one aperture, which may receive a vertical support member, thereby securing the vegetable support member in place. Extending from the sidewall is a base member characterized by a curved shape, forming the bottom surface of the vegetable support member. The vegetable support member also incorporates a distal end portion of the base member, projecting away from the sidewall, which defines a curved profile. Additionally, the base member is equipped with at least one second aperture on its bottom surface, purposed for facilitating fluid drainage.