Vegetation Risk Prediction Using Satellite Imagery and LIDAR

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vegetation management methods are labor-intensive and inefficient, as they rely on manual inspections to predict and address vegetation overgrowth, especially during adverse weather conditions, which can lead to damage to infrastructure and assets.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning-based system that uses satellite imagery and LIDAR data to train neural networks to identify high-risk vegetation areas by analyzing changes over time, combining this information with weather and terrain data to generate risk scores and trigger corrective actions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual inspection methods are used to identify and manage vegetation, then accuracy in identifying high-risk vegetation can be maintained through expert judgment, but labor intensity and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy in identifying high-risk vegetationVSAvoidlabor efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical inspection with an automated computer-based system that uses satellite imagery, LIDAR data, and machine learning algorithms to identify high-risk vegetation. The system automatically processes multi-source data to generate risk scores, eliminating the need for manual field inspections while maintaining identification accuracy through sophisticated analytical models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by automatically monitoring vegetation conditions and generating risk assessments without requiring human inspectors. The machine learning model continuously analyzes satellite and LIDAR data to identify potential risks, allowing the system to serve itself in detecting and prioritizing vegetation management needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If reactive vegetation management is used (addressing problems after they occur), then response to actual damage can be confirmed, but prevention of potential damage during adverse weather is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfirmation of actual damageVSAvoidpotential damage during adverse weather
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by proactively identifying vegetation that is at risk of causing damage during adverse weather events before the events occur. The system analyzes current vegetation conditions, historical weather data, and predictive models to flag high-risk areas in advance, enabling preventive management actions to be taken before damage occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by taking corrective measures against potential vegetation-related damage before adverse weather events occur. By identifying high-risk vegetation in advance and implementing management actions, the system counteracts the potential harmful effects of wind, ice, or other severe weather conditions before they can cause infrastructure damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive data collection (satellite imagery, LIDAR, weather data) is implemented, then prediction accuracy of vegetation risk improves, but system complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracy of vegetation riskVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by using a single integrated machine learning model that processes multiple data types (satellite imagery, LIDAR, weather data) through a unified framework. The model is designed to handle diverse data sources and perform multiple functions including risk assessment, priority scoring, and predictive analysis, reducing the need for separate specialized systems for each data type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model serves as an intermediary that bridges complex multi-source data and simple risk assessment outputs. The model abstracts the complexity of processing satellite imagery, LIDAR point clouds, and weather data by translating these diverse inputs into standardized risk scores that can be easily interpreted and acted upon by vegetation management systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Loss of time

If frequent monitoring is performed to detect vegetation changes, then early detection of high-risk areas is achieved, but resource consumption and processing load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime to detect vegetation changesVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic action by monitoring vegetation conditions at regular intervals using scheduled satellite imagery and LIDAR data collection. Instead of continuous monitoring, the system analyzes vegetation at predetermined time intervals, which reduces computational resource consumption while still enabling timely detection of significant vegetation changes that could indicate increasing risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS11436712B2Predicting and correcting vegetation state
Publication Date: 2022.09.06 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11436712B2 patent drawing
  • US11436712B2 patent drawing
  • US11436712B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for managing vegetation include training a machine learning model based on an image of a training data region before a weather event, an image of the training data region after the weather event, and information regarding the weather event. A risk score is generated for a second region using the trained machine learning model based on an image of the second region and predicted weather information for the second region. The risk score is determined to indicate high-risk vegetation in the second region. A corrective action is performed to reduce the risk of vegetation in the second region.