Vehicle Acceleration Controller Using Neural Network Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Calibrating vehicle acceleration controllers is time-consuming due to numerous influencing parameters, requiring extensive experiments and detailed lookup tables to achieve accurate longitudinal force adjustments for safe driving.

Innovation Solution

A method using a trained machine learning algorithm, specifically an artificial neural network, to predict and adjust the longitudinal force set by the acceleration controller based on measured vehicle acceleration, eliminating the need for detailed lookup tables and enabling real-time adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional calibration methods with detailed lookup tables are used, then manufacturing precision of longitudinal force adjustment is improved, but time consumption for calibration increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelongitudinal force adjustment precisionVSAvoidcalibration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical calibration approach (physical experiments, manual lookup table creation) with a machine learning-based system. The neural network learns the complex nonlinear relationships between longitudinal force and acceleration through data-driven training, substituting the time-consuming physical calibration process with computational modeling that provides both high precision and real-time performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary training of the machine learning model using historical drive data during the development phase. This preliminary action creates a pre-trained neural network that already contains learned relationships between force and acceleration, eliminating the need for time-consuming on-site calibration experiments and lookup table generation during vehicle commissioning or operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If extensive experiments and detailed lookup tables are used for calibration, then reliability of acceleration control is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacceleration control accuracyVSAvoidcalibration system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the calibration approach from using static lookup tables with discrete force-acceleration pairs to a continuous machine learning model that processes multiple input parameters (longitudinal force, vehicle mass, friction coefficients, external conditions, temperatures, slopes) simultaneously. This parameter transformation enables the system to handle the complexity of multiple influencing factors through a unified neural network model rather than requiring separate calibration data for each parameter combination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a virtual model (neural network) that copies and represents the complex physical relationships between longitudinal force and vehicle acceleration. Instead of relying on extensive physical experiments to characterize each parameter combination, the neural network learns these relationships from training data and creates a computational copy of the system behavior, simplifying the overall calibration system while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If real-time adjustment of longitudinal force is implemented, then productivity of calibration process is improved, but measurement precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration speedVSAvoidacceleration measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the measured actual acceleration is continuously compared with the predicted acceleration from the neural network. The longitudinal force is adjusted based on this feedback loop, allowing the system to adapt to measurement variations and maintain accuracy. This feedback approach enables real-time adjustment while compensating for measurement uncertainties through iterative optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3828051B1Improving vehicle dynamics by predicting the longitudinal acceleration
Publication Date: 2022.10.05 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • EP3828051B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for operating an acceleration controller of a vehicle, comprising the steps: predicting a value of a longitudinal acceleration of the vehicle, using a trained machine learning algorithm, based on a longitudinal force set by the acceleration controller; measuring a value of the longitudinal acceleration of the vehicle; adjusting the longitudinal force set by the acceleration controller, based on the predicted value of the longitudinal acceleration of the vehicle and based on the measured value of the longitudinal acceleration of the vehicle.