Vehicle Action Pre-Arming With Conditional Triggers and Timeline

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Human-in-the-loop control systems face challenges due to human impatience, forgetfulness, and difficulties with sequential and accurate interactions, particularly in user interface systems like touchscreens, which can diminish situational awareness and increase workload in operating vehicles.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize a user interface and processor to pre-arm multiple actions according to a conditional timeline, with trigger events, allowing actions to be completed non-simultaneously and reducing the need for continuous human intervention by monitoring trigger events and executing actions automatically when conditions are met.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a human operator manually completes each action in a sequence according to prescribed criteria, then the system maintains high reliability through human judgment, but the operator's workload increases and situational awareness diminishes due to the complexity of tracking multiple sequential steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask completion reliabilityVSAvoiduser workload
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows operators to pre-arm multiple actions in advance, defining their trigger criteria and sequence beforehand. This preliminary configuration reduces the operator's real-time workload while ensuring reliable execution according to the predetermined sequence and criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically monitors for trigger events and executes pre-armed actions without requiring continuous human intervention. This self-service capability maintains task completion reliability while significantly reducing the operator's workload and improving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If a touchscreen interface requires accurate sequential hand inputs for each action, then the system maintains precise control, but the interface becomes difficult to operate and user patience is tested due to the need for accurate repositioning between widely time-spaced steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinput accuracyVSAvoidinterface usability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows operators to pre-armed actions in advance, so that during execution they only need to monitor for trigger events rather than manually input each step. This maintains precise control through the predefined sequence while dramatically improving interface usability by eliminating repeated accurate positioning requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides automated feedback by monitoring trigger events and notifying the operator when conditions are met for pre-armed actions. This feedback mechanism maintains input accuracy by ensuring the correct sequence is followed while improving ease of operation by eliminating the need for continuous manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of information

If the system requires continuous human intervention to monitor and complete each action, then the operator maintains situational awareness, but the operator becomes impatient and may miss steps or forget criteria due to the repetitive nature of the task

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesituational awarenessVSAvoidtask completion consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows operators to pre-arm all actions in the sequence in advance, configuring trigger criteria and timing. This preliminary setup ensures consistent execution according to the defined sequence, eliminating the risk of operators missing steps or forgetting criteria while maintaining situational awareness through automated monitoring and notifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically monitors for trigger events and executes pre-armed actions without requiring continuous human intervention. This self-service capability maintains task completion consistency by eliminating human errors such as impatience or forgetfulness, while keeping the operator informed of system status to maintain situational awareness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11953921B2Vehicular system and method for pre-arming actions according to conditional timeline and associated trigger events
Publication Date: 2024.04.09 ROCKWELL COLLINS INC
  • US11953921B2 patent drawing
  • US11953921B2 patent drawing
  • US11953921B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system may include a user interface and a processor. The processor may be configured to (a) pre-arm multiple actions according to a conditional timeline and any associated trigger events, and (b) output commands to cause the multiple actions to be completed at times consistent with the conditional timeline and any associated trigger events.