Vehicle Activity Recommendation System for Traffic Congestion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems fail to provide activity recommendations to users in vehicles, especially when traffic congestion occurs, neglecting the presence of multiple users and their relationships, and do not consider the destination or available time until arrival.

Innovation Solution

A system that identifies users and determines their relationships onboard a vehicle, generates activity recommendations based on detected traffic conditions and available information sources, providing joint activities for multiple users or customized recommendations for individual users, using computing devices and sensors like cameras for facial recognition and biometric data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the system provides activity recommendations to users during traffic congestion, then user productivity and experience are improved, but the system complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser productivityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments users into different groups based on their relationships (e.g., family members, colleagues, friends) and provides customized activity recommendations for each segment. This allows the system to handle complexity by dividing the user base into manageable segments with similar characteristics and preferences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing user relationship data and traffic condition information before generating recommendations. It pre-identifies user relationships using contact lists, social media data, and communication patterns, and pre-detects traffic conditions using GPS and traffic data APIs, so that when activity recommendations are needed, the system can quickly generate them without excessive processing delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of information

If the system analyzes user relationships and traffic conditions to generate personalized recommendations, then recommendation quality is improved, but information processing requirements and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation utilizationVSAvoidcomputational load
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential and relevant information from multiple data sources such as contact lists, social media profiles, communication logs, and traffic data. Instead of processing all available information, it selectively extracts key relationship indicators and traffic conditions that are most useful for generating activity recommendations, thereby reducing computational load while maintaining recommendation quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by adjusting the depth and detail of relationship analysis based on available data and computational resources. It dynamically modifies processing parameters such as the level of social media analysis, the recency weight of communications, and the granularity of traffic condition data to optimize between information utilization and computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If the system considers multiple information sources including social media and communication data, then relationship determination accuracy is improved, but data privacy concerns and security requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelationship determination accuracyVSAvoiddata privacy risks
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses an intermediary approach by processing relationship data through multiple layers of abstraction and aggregation before generating recommendations. It intermediates between raw sensitive data (communication logs, social media posts) and the final relationship determination by using derived features such as interaction frequency patterns, communication topic categories, and relationship strength scores, thereby reducing direct exposure to sensitive personal information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service mechanisms where users can control which information sources are accessed and how their data is used. It provides users with options to opt-in or opt-out of specific data collection methods, review the relationship data that has been determined, and adjust their privacy preferences, thereby giving users direct control over their personal information while still enabling accurate relationship analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11187551B2Methods and systems for recommending activities to users onboard vehicles
Publication Date: 2021.11.30 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11187551B2 patent drawing
  • US11187551B2 patent drawing
  • US11187551B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments for generating recommendations for user activity onboard a vehicle are provided. A first user and a second user onboard a vehicle are identified. A relationship between the first user and the second user is determined based on at least one information source associated with at least one of the first user and the second user. A traffic condition associated with the vehicle traveling to a destination is detected. A recommendation of an joint activity for the first user and the second user while onboard the vehicle is generated based on the determined relationship between the first user and the second user, the detected traffic condition, and the at least one information source.