Vehicle Actuation Control Using Dual Communication Lines

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle control systems fail to adequately control the actuation state of targets, such as sensors and controllers, leading to potential inefficiencies and safety concerns in sustainable transportation systems.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle control device and method that utilize separate communication lines to monitor and control the actuation state of targets like LIDAR units, ensuring appropriate activation based on signal inputs and communication states, thereby maintaining optimal system functionality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single communication line is used to control target actuation, then the system complexity is reduced, but the reliability of actuation control deteriorates due to inability to properly manage actuation states

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication line configurationVSAvoidactuation control reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The communication system is segmented into two separate communication lines: a first communication line for transmitting actuation signals and a second communication line for transmitting status information. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each communication channel, improving overall reliability while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A control device acts as an intermediary between the communication lines and the target actuator. It receives signals from the first communication line, verifies status information from the second communication line, and then controls target actuation based on this processed information, ensuring reliable actuation control through intermediate verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If communication verification is implemented before target actuation, then the actuation control reliability is improved, but the response time deteriorates due to additional verification steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuation control reliabilityVSAvoidtarget actuation response time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary verification of communication status through the second communication line before initiating target actuation via the first communication line. This preliminary action ensures that communication channels are functional and targets are in the correct state before actuation commands are executed, preventing wasted actuation cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The second communication line continuously monitors and transmits status information about the target and communication channel health. This continuous verification enables the control device to maintain readiness for immediate actuation while ensuring reliability, reducing the effective verification time needed at actuation moments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20260003076A1Vehicle control device, vehicle control method, and storage medium
Publication Date: 2026.01.01 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US20260003076A1 patent drawing
  • US20260003076A1 patent drawing
  • US20260003076A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle control device acquires a first communication state of a first instruction line which is connected to a target utilized for controlling a vehicle and issues an instruction for power for the entire vehicle separately from a power supply line for supplying power to the target, acquires a second communication state of a second instruction line which is connected to the target and differs from the power supply line and the first instruction line, actuates the target when a first signal indicating the instruction for power in the first communication state has been input to the first instruction line or when the second communication state is normal, and does not actuate the target when the first signal indicating the instruction for power in the first communication state has not been input to the first instruction line and the second communication state is not normal.