Vehicle Alert Processing for Preceding Deceleration Warnings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle travel control systems fail to effectively prevent rear-end collisions by not adequately anticipating and responding to rapid deceleration of preceding vehicles, leading to potential safety hazards.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus mounted on a vehicle, equipped with a controller that determines alerts for deceleration in preceding vehicles and performs risk avoidance processes, including notifying the driver and potentially applying automatic braking, based on data transmitted from external devices and other vehicles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the system waits for the preceding vehicle to actually decelerate before alerting the following vehicle, then the alert system is simple and reliable, but the following vehicle cannot prepare in time for rapid deceleration, increasing rear-end collision risk

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by detecting alert signals from the preceding vehicle before actual deceleration occurs. When the controller detects an alert signal transmitted by the preceding vehicle, it proactively notifies the following vehicle's driver to prepare for potential rapid deceleration, enabling the following vehicle to take preventive measures in advance rather than waiting for deceleration to actually occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by preparing the following vehicle counter to the potential harmful effect of rapid deceleration. By notifying the following vehicle driver in advance when an alert is detected, the system creates a preparatory state that counteracts the sudden deceleration effect, reducing the risk of rear-end collision before it can occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

2Reliability

If the system continuously monitors and transmits alert status data between vehicles, then the safety response is improved, but the communication load and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the critical alert status information from the preceding vehicle and transmits it to following vehicles, rather than continuously transmitting all vehicle data. The controller specifically detects and transmits alert signals and alert status data when relevant, reducing unnecessary communication load while maintaining safety effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by having following vehicles transmit their alert status data back to other vehicles in the vicinity. When a following vehicle receives an alert notification, it can transmit its own alert status to subsequent vehicles, creating a chain of awareness that propagates safety information through traffic without requiring centralized control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12012096B2Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and storing medium
Publication Date: 2024.06.18 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US12012096B2 patent drawing
  • US12012096B2 patent drawing
  • US12012096B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing apparatus mounted on a first vehicle determines that an alert to decelerate is being issued to a driver of a preceding vehicle that precedes the first vehicle; and performs a predetermined process related to risk avoidance when the alert is being issued is the preceding vehicle.