Agricultural Vehicle Alert Zones for Towed Implement Collision Risk

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing agricultural vehicle alert systems fail to adequately account for the impact of towed implements on the collision risk with nearby objects, leading to inefficient alert zone definitions that may generate false alarms or miss potential hazards.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method for defining alert zones around agricultural vehicles that adjusts the size and shape of side zones based on characteristics of the towed implement, such as type, angle, and operational state, using implement sensors and vehicle indicators to predict future locations and modify the alert zone boundaries.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a fixed alert zone is defined around the agricultural vehicle without considering implement characteristics, then the system is simple to operate, but the collision risk assessment accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealert system operationVSAvoidcollision risk assessment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The alert zone boundaries are made dynamic by continuously adjusting them based on real-time implement characteristics such as type, angle, and operational state. The system transitions from a static fixed zone to a dynamic adaptive zone that automatically recalculates boundaries as implement parameters change, resolving the contradiction between operational simplicity and assessment accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters defining the alert zone (size, shape, position) in response to changes in implement parameters. By linking zone parameters to implement characteristics, the system automatically adapts the alert boundaries without requiring manual intervention, thereby maintaining ease of operation while improving collision risk assessment accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the alert zone size is increased to cover all possible implement positions, then the safety coverage is improved, but the false alarm rate increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety coverageVSAvoidfalse alarm rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The alert zone is divided into different regions with different boundary definitions based on local implement characteristics. Instead of using a uniform large zone, the system creates localized alert boundaries that specifically cover the areas where the implement actually operates, thereby maintaining comprehensive safety coverage while eliminating unnecessary zones that would generate false alarms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system preliminarily determines the implement characteristics and predicts the implement's future position before defining the alert zone boundaries. By pre-calculating the appropriate zone size and shape based on current implement parameters and predicted motion, the system establishes accurate boundaries in advance, preventing both safety gaps and false alarm zones from forming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If the alert zone is dynamically adjusted based on implement characteristics, then the collision risk assessment accuracy is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision risk assessment accuracyVSAvoidalert system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex task of dynamic alert zone adjustment is segmented into distinct functional modules: implement characteristic detection, parameter processing, zone boundary calculation, and boundary application. Each module handles a specific aspect of the problem, making the overall complex system manageable through functional decomposition and reducing the cognitive load on the operator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically detecting implement characteristics, calculating appropriate alert zone boundaries, and applying the adjustments without requiring manual intervention. The electronic control unit autonomously processes implement parameters and updates the alert zone definitions, thereby improving collision risk assessment accuracy while masking the underlying system complexity from the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If implement sensors are positioned on the agricultural vehicle to obtain implement indicators, then the measurement reliability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplement indicator measurementVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor system is designed with multi-functionality, where a single sensor unit on the vehicle performs multiple measurement tasks: detecting implement position, angle, and operational state simultaneously. This universal sensor approach improves measurement reliability by centralizing data collection while avoiding the complexity of multiple separate sensor systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20260084528A1Defining Alert Zones for an Agricultural Vehicle
Publication Date: 2026.03.26 AGCO INT GMBH
  • US20260084528A1 patent drawing
  • US20260084528A1 patent drawing
  • US20260084528A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A mechanism for defining an alert zone surrounding an agricultural vehicle. The size and/or shape of side zones, that span alongside the agricultural vehicle, of the alert zone are defined or modified responsive to one or more characteristics of an implement that is being towed by the agricultural vehicle.