Vehicle Alerting System for Traffic Light Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems fail to effectively detect and prevent accidents caused by drivers missing traffic lights due to glare, poor visibility, or drowsiness, and do not adequately alert drivers about impending collisions from running red lights or stop signs.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle-mounted system with forwardly directed optical sensors and an image processing unit that captures and analyzes road images to determine if a vehicle is approaching a traffic light or sign within a safe braking distance, generating alerts via visual or audible signals to the driver and potentially neighboring vehicles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If drivers rely on visual perception of traffic lights, then they can detect traffic light states, but visibility is reduced due to sun glare, poor weather conditions, or driver drowsiness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraffic light state detection accuracyVSAvoidvisibility reduction
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the driver's biological visual perception system with an electronic optical sensor system. The sensor captures images of traffic lights, and an image processing unit analyzes these images to determine traffic light states, substituting the mechanical/biological eye-brain system with an electronic detection system that is not affected by glare or drowsiness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary alerting system between the traffic light and the driver. Instead of relying directly on the driver's vision, the system uses sensors to detect traffic light states and provides indirect feedback through alert signals (visual or audible) to the driver, mediating the information transfer and protecting against direct visual impairment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of time

If drivers manually monitor traffic lights and road signs, then they can respond to traffic conditions, but reaction time is delayed due to human limitations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver reaction timeVSAvoidtraffic flow efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection and analysis of traffic light states and vehicle positioning before the driver would naturally perceive them. By continuously monitoring traffic light states and calculating safe braking distances in advance, the system prepares alert signals ready for immediate transmission, eliminating the delay in human perception and reaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a closed-loop feedback system where sensors continuously monitor traffic light states, the system calculates safe braking distances based on vehicle speed and position, and provides real-time alert feedback to the driver. This continuous feedback loop replaces the intermittent human monitoring process, reducing reaction time and improving traffic flow efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If the system provides alert signals to drivers, then collision risk is reduced, but driver alert fatigue may occur from excessive warnings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidanceVSAvoiddriver operation comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by providing differentiated alert signals based on specific local conditions. Instead of uniform warnings, the system analyzes the particular traffic situation (traffic light state, vehicle speed, distance to intersection) and provides targeted alerts only when necessary, making the alert system adaptive to local conditions rather than applying a one-size-fits-all approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides timely alerts to drivers to apply braking force, reducing the risk of collisions by accurately determining the distance and speed of vehicles relative to traffic lights or signs, even in adverse conditions, and transmitting warnings to nearby vehicles to prevent chain collisions.

Implementation Method 1

one or more forwardly directed optical sensors mounted on a same vehicle which are configured to capture road-related images

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric Effect: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS10332401B2Running vehicle alerting system and method
Publication Date: 2019.06.25 FORESIGHT AUTOMOTIVE LTD
  • US10332401B2 patent drawing
  • US10332401B2 patent drawing
  • US10332401B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A running vehicle alerting system, comprising one or more forwardly directed optical sensors mounted on a same vehicle which are configured to capture road related images; an image processing unit configured to analyze the captured road-related images in real time and to determine, based on the analyzed images, whether the vehicle on which the one or more optical sensors are mounted is to be considered as a running vehicle that is spaced from a traffic light or a traffic sign by a distance shorter than a threshold safe braking distance and that is liable to endanger other vehicles; and an alert signal generating unit responsive to the determination of the vehicle as a running vehicle, for generating a collision avoiding alert signal.