In-Vehicle Analysis Selection for Real-Time Driving Support

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems fail to provide appropriately hierarchized driving support information in real-time for vehicle control, as they cannot effectively manage delay times in transmitting and analyzing sensor data, leading to inefficiencies in using detailed information when the vehicle approaches a dynamic object.

Innovation Solution

An in-vehicle device with an allowable delay estimation unit, transfer delay estimation unit, and determination unit that selects appropriate analysis processes based on the difference between allowable and transfer delays to generate hierarchized driving support information, ensuring timely and effective use of data for automated driving functions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If comprehensive sensor data analysis is performed to generate detailed driving support information, then the quality and completeness of driving support information is improved, but the processing time and delay increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of driving support informationVSAvoidprocessing delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the driving support information into multiple hierarchical levels (first level: basic object detection, second level: detailed attribute analysis, third level: predictive analysis). The determination unit selectively executes analysis processes based on the allowable delay, performing only necessary segmentation levels rather than comprehensive analysis, thus balancing information quality with processing time constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by selectively executing only the necessary analysis processes based on the allowable delay. When delay is critical, only essential first-level analysis is performed. When more time is available, additional second-level or third-level analysis is added. This avoids performing excessive unnecessary analysis while ensuring minimum required quality is maintained.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Loss of information

If multiple analysis processes are executed to generate comprehensive driving support information, then the completeness of information is improved, but the device complexity and processing load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of driving support informationVSAvoidprocessing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the analysis system dynamic by allowing the determination unit to adaptively select which analysis processes to execute based on real-time allowable delay conditions. The system transitions between different operational modes (minimal analysis, moderate analysis, comprehensive analysis) rather than being statically configured, optimizing the balance between information completeness and processing complexity based on current timing constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of analysis depth based on the allowable delay parameter. When allowable delay is large, deeper analysis parameters are used; when allowable delay is small, shallower analysis parameters are used. This parameter-based adaptation allows the system to maintain appropriate information completeness while adjusting processing complexity to match available time resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Speed

If real-time driving support information is provided for automated driving control, then the responsiveness to dynamic objects is improved, but the accuracy and detail of information may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponsiveness of driving supportVSAvoidaccuracy of driving support information
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing basic first-level analysis (object detection and classification) immediately upon receiving sensor data, providing rapid initial driving support information. Based on the allowable delay and situation, additional second-level or third-level analysis is then performed to enhance accuracy and detail. This ensures real-time responsiveness is maintained while opportunity for improved accuracy is captured when time permits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240400044A1In-vehicle device, in-vehicle system, control method, and computer program
Publication Date: 2024.12.05 SUMITOMO ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES LTD
  • US20240400044A1 patent drawing
  • US20240400044A1 patent drawing
  • US20240400044A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An in-vehicle device installed in a vehicle having an automated driving function, includes: an allowable delay estimation unit that estimates, as an allowable delay, a time until the vehicle reaches a dynamic object; a transfer delay estimation unit that estimates, as a transfer delay, a time from when the in-vehicle device receives data from outside of the vehicle to when the in-vehicle device transfers the data to an execution unit for executing the automated driving function, based on load states of information processing and information transfer in the vehicle; a determination unit that selects a specific analysis process from among a plurality of analysis processes for analyzing the data received from the outside, based on a difference between the allowable delay and the transfer delay; and a driving support information generation unit configured to generate driving support information by executing the specific analysis process selected by the determination unit.