Vehicle Application Anomaly Detection Using Mobility State Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing anomaly detection devices for vehicles, such as those described in PTL1, are insufficient in addressing security threats from malicious third parties who can attach vehicles by transmitting authorized CAN messages to the Electronic Control Unit, as they do not consider such attacks and lack adequate security measures.

Innovation Solution

An information processing device connected to a mobility network that includes a storage for determination criterion information and a detector to obtain behavior and state information, using models like rule-based or machine learning to identify anomalies in application behavior, enhancing security by defining normal and anomalous behaviors and states to detect malicious activities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If anomaly detection is performed using traditional methods (monitoring file accesses with LSM), then basic security monitoring is achieved, but detection precision against sophisticated attacks (such as authorized CAN message transmissions) is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection precisionVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection system is segmented into multiple independent components: behavior information acquisition unit, state information acquisition unit, determination criterion storage, and anomaly detection unit. Each component handles a specific aspect of detection, allowing the system to achieve high detection precision through specialized processing while maintaining manageable complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from traditional single-dimension file access monitoring to multi-dimensional analysis by simultaneously acquiring behavior information (application operations) and state information (vehicle system states). This dimensional expansion enables detection of sophisticated attacks that traditional methods miss, achieving higher precision without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If comprehensive behavior and state information monitoring is implemented to detect sophisticated attacks, then detection precision improves, but system complexity and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity detection reliabilityVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Determination criterion information is pre-stored in the system, containing predefined rules and thresholds for normal behavior patterns. This preliminary preparation allows the anomaly detection unit to quickly compare real-time behavior and state information against established criteria, achieving high reliability without requiring complex real-time analysis algorithms that would increase system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces determination criterion information as an intermediary layer between raw behavior/state data and anomaly detection results. This intermediary contains pre-processed knowledge about normal system behavior, enabling the detector to reliably identify anomalies through simple comparison operations rather than complex analytical processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If traditional anomaly detection methods are used, then system simplicity is maintained, but the system cannot detect sophisticated attacks involving authorized CAN messages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capability against sophisticated attacksVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The anomaly detection unit is designed with universal functionality to detect multiple types of attacks through a unified framework. By monitoring both behavior information (application-level operations) and state information (vehicle system states) simultaneously and comparing them against determination criterion information, the system can detect various sophisticated attacks including authorized CAN message transmissions, without requiring separate specialized detection mechanisms for each attack type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11615183B2Information processing device, control method, and recording medium for detecting an anomaly in behavior of an application operating on a device in a mobility
Publication Date: 2023.03.28 PANASONIC AUTOMOTIVE SYST CO LTD
  • US11615183B2 patent drawing
  • US11615183B2 patent drawing
  • US11615183B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing device includes: a storage that stores determination criterion information indicating a determination criterion for determining whether or not a behavior of an application operating on a device provided to a vehicle is normal; and a detector that obtains behavior information indicating the behavior of the application, and detects an anomaly in the behavior of the application, based on (i) state information that indicates a state of the mobility and is obtained via the mobility network and (ii) the behavior information obtained and the determination criterion information stored in the storage.