Vehicle Driving Assist System Dynamic Control Pattern

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional vehicle driving assist systems often execute excessive control that is contrary to the driver's intent, particularly in heavy traffic or crowded merge situations, due to difficulty in adapting to specific traffic conditions.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle driving assist system that selects an appropriate control pattern based on the driver's intention, calculated using the accelerator pedal actuation state and positional relationship with obstacles, to adjust the accelerator pedal reaction force and deceleration, thereby reducing annoyance and improving control matching the driver's intent.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the system executes control based on risk potential and time to collision, then the safety and obstacle avoidance capability is improved, but the system may perform excessive control that is contrary to the driver's intent in heavy traffic or crowded merge situations

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidadaptability to driver intent
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the control execution region based on the driver's predicted intention. When the driver intends to accelerate, the control execution region is shortened; when the driver intends to decelerate and the distance to obstacle is increasing, the control execution region is lengthened. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to maintain safety while respecting the driver's intent in different traffic situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of control execution region length based on detected driver intention and traffic conditions. By modifying this parameter, the system achieves different control behaviors: shorter execution region when driver intends to accelerate (reducing excessive control), and longer execution region when driver intends to decelerate (maintaining safety). This parameter change resolves the contradiction between safety and adaptability to driver intent.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If the system uses a fixed control execution region, then the control logic is simple, but the system cannot adapt to different traffic situations and driver intentions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol logic complexityVSAvoidadaptability to traffic situations
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The control execution region is made dynamic rather than fixed. The system adjusts the execution region length based on driver intention detection and traffic situation analysis. This dynamic approach enables the system to adapt to different traffic situations (heavy traffic, crowded merges, open roads) while maintaining a relatively simple control logic structure that selects from predefined control patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If the system shortens the control execution region when driver intends to accelerate, then the interference with driver operation is reduced, but the safety margin may be compromised in high-risk situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver operation smoothnessVSAvoidsafety margin
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the control execution region parameter based on both driver intention and risk assessment. When driver intends to accelerate, the execution region is shortened to reduce interference with driver operation. However, the system maintains safety by considering the overall risk situation and using appropriate control patterns that ensure adequate safety margins even with the shortened execution region.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP1743818B1Vehicle driving assist system
Publication Date: 2015.06.10 NISSAN MOTOR CO LTD
  • EP1743818B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1743818B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP1743818B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A vehicle driving assist system executes an actuation reaction force control of accelerator pedal, a driving force control or a braking force control in a manner that is appropriate in consideration of the traffic situation in which the vehicle is being driven. The vehicle driving assist system calculates a risk potential that indicates the degree of convergence between the vehicle and an obstacle existing in front of the vehicle based on a prescribed control pattern. Then, based on the risk potential, the accelerator pedal actuation reaction, the host vehicle driving force and/or the host vehicle braking force are controlled. The intent of the driver regarding acceleration and deceleration based on the actuation state of the accelerator pedal is preferably used in controlling one or all of the accelerator pedal actuation reaction, the host vehicle driving force and the host vehicle braking force.