Vehicle Battery Telemetry for Real-Time Failure Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for predicting component failure in vehicle fleets are unreliable due to variations in operating conditions and lack of real-time monitoring, leading to unnecessary maintenance costs and vehicle breakdowns.

Innovation Solution

A vehicular telemetry system that collects and analyzes operational parameters in real-time, using statistical analysis and contextual information to generate predictions of component failure or deterioration, accounting for vehicle-specific conditions and interactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If Mean Time Between Failure engineering data is used to predict component failure, then a prediction timeline is established, but the prediction is inaccurate due to variations in operating conditions and lack of real-time monitoring

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent failure prediction accuracyVSAvoidfailure prediction precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors component operational parameters in real-time and feeds this data back to update the degradation model. This feedback loop allows the system to adjust predictions based on actual component behavior rather than relying solely on static historical data, thereby improving both reliability and measurement precision of failure predictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of operational parameters to detect early signs of component degradation before actual failure occurs. By analyzing trends in voltage, current, temperature, and other parameters, the system can predict potential failures in advance, allowing for proactive maintenance while the component is still functional.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of manufacture

If manufacturer's recommended maintenance schedule based on running total of mileage or operational time is applied, then maintenance timing is standardized, but unnecessary maintenance costs are incurred due to inability to accurately predict actual component status

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance scheduling simplicityVSAvoidunnecessary maintenance costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static, time-based maintenance scheduling to dynamic, condition-based scheduling. By continuously monitoring component health parameters and updating degradation models in real-time, the system adapts maintenance schedules to actual component conditions rather than following fixed intervals, thereby eliminating unnecessary maintenance while maintaining component reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the basis of maintenance scheduling from time/mileage parameters to component condition parameters. By monitoring operational parameters such as voltage, current, temperature, and degradation rates, the system determines maintenance needs based on actual component state rather than predetermined time intervals, optimizing maintenance timing and reducing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If simple comparisons of current value with previous value are used, then the monitoring process is simple, but accurate prediction of component failure cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring process simplicityVSAvoidfailure prediction reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces a degradation model as an intermediary between raw operational parameter comparisons and failure predictions. This model processes simple parameter comparisons and transforms them into reliable failure predictions by incorporating knowledge of component degradation patterns, operating conditions, and failure modes, thereby maintaining operational simplicity while improving prediction reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP3525180B1Telematically monitoring and predicting a vehicle battery state
Publication Date: 2026.01.28 GEOTAB INC
  • EP3525180B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3525180B1 patent drawingFigure 2a
  • EP3525180B1 patent drawingFigure 2b

AI summary

Apparatus, device, methods and system relating to a vehicular telemetry environment for monitoring vehicle components and providing indications towards the condition of the vehicle components and providing optimal indications towards replacement or maintenance of vehicle components before vehicle component failure.