Vehicle Behavior Pattern Analysis for Road Anomaly Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional anomaly detection systems fail to accurately characterize and classify anomalies in vehicular contexts, often misleading due to lack of consideration for environmental and human behavior factors, leading to inaccurate detection and increased traffic risks.

Innovation Solution

A system that analyzes vehicle behavior patterns using sensors to distinguish between extrinsic and intrinsic anomalies by comparing detected patterns with a database, employing additional human observation when necessary, and deploying resources based on anomaly type.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional anomaly detection systems are used, then anomaly detection capability is provided, but detection accuracy is poor and anomalies cannot be classified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments anomaly detection into two distinct stages: (1) anomaly detection using evasive maneuver identification, and (2) anomaly classification using collective behavior patterns. This segmentation allows each stage to focus on specific tasks, improving overall detection accuracy while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces collective behavior patterns as an intermediary layer between raw sensor data and anomaly classification. By aggregating behavior data from multiple vehicles and comparing against stored patterns, the system enhances detection accuracy without requiring complex individual vehicle analysis, thus resolving the contradiction between accuracy and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If anomaly classification is added to detection systems, then anomaly characterization capability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly classification capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates copies of behavior patterns from multiple vehicles and stores them in a database for comparison. Instead of analyzing complex individual vehicle behaviors in real-time, the system compares current behavior against pre-captured pattern copies, enabling anomaly classification while keeping real-time processing complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The collective behavior pattern database serves multiple functions: it acts as a reference for anomaly classification, a training dataset for pattern recognition, and a validation mechanism for detection accuracy. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate specialized systems, thereby limiting the increase in overall system complexity while enhancing adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If collective behavior patterns from multiple vehicles are analyzed, then anomaly classification accuracy is improved, but data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly classification accuracyVSAvoiddata processing load
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential collective behavior features from raw sensor data of multiple vehicles, such as evasive maneuver patterns, speed changes, and trajectory deviations. By taking out only the relevant behavioral characteristics rather than processing complete raw datasets, the system improves classification accuracy while significantly reducing data processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If evasive maneuvers are used as detection basis, then anomaly detection capability is provided, but false positives increase due to lack of context

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection reliabilityVSAvoidcontextual information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where detected evasive maneuvers trigger collection of additional contextual data from surrounding vehicles, and where classification results feed back into refining future detections. This feedback mechanism ensures that contextual information is gathered and utilized, reducing false positives while maintaining reliable anomaly detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12499753B2Systems and methods for leveraging evasive maneuvers to classify anomalies
Publication Date: 2025.12.16 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US12499753B2 patent drawing
  • US12499753B2 patent drawing
  • US12499753B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for the classification of anomalies present in road regions. Anomalies may be extrinsic or intrinsic. Intrinsic anomalies may pose a greater safety risk to drivers than extrinsic anomalies. Intrinsic anomalies may be identified by detection of an evasive maneuver of a vehicle in a road region, measurement of the properties of other vehicles and the surrounding environment in the road region, determination of a vehicle behavior pattern in a road region, and comparison of the determined vehicle behavior pattern in the road region to other vehicle behavior patterns stored in a database.