Vehicle Rider Behavior Monitoring With Triggered Incident Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Monitoring the behavior of vehicle operators and passengers is challenging due to the dynamic nature of vehicles, making it difficult to detect undesirable behavior and respond appropriately.

Innovation Solution

A behavioral monitoring system that uses sensor data from vehicles to detect undesirable behavior, such as inappropriate language or physical movements, and executes predefined responses, including generating incident reports and transmitting notifications, through a network-connected architecture with a user interface for administrators to define triggering conditions and actions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional monitoring methods are used for vehicle operators and passengers, then the system complexity remains low, but the ability to detect and respond to undesirable behavior is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebehavioral monitoring reliabilityVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system is segmented into multiple independent sensor modules (cameras, microphones, accelerometers) that can be distributed throughout the vehicle. Each sensor captures specific behavioral aspects, and the system processes them separately before integration, improving monitoring reliability without requiring a monolithic complex system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system is designed to perform multiple functions using the same sensor infrastructure: detecting undesirable behavior, monitoring safety conditions, and tracking vehicle operational status. This multi-functionality improves reliability across different monitoring needs while avoiding the complexity of separate dedicated systems for each function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive sensor data collection is implemented to detect all undesirable behaviors, then detection accuracy improves, but data processing complexity and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebehavior detection accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary processing of sensor data by implementing predefined triggering conditions and response protocols before full analysis is required. When sensors detect conditions matching predefined criteria (e.g., sudden acceleration, loud noises), the system immediately triggers appropriate responses, improving detection accuracy while reducing the complexity of analyzing all raw sensor data comprehensively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements partial monitoring by focusing on specific predefined undesirable behaviors rather than attempting to analyze all possible behaviors. By concentrating computational resources on detecting specific trigger conditions (e.g., falling, shouting, sudden movements), the system achieves high detection accuracy for targeted behaviors without the overwhelming complexity of comprehensive behavioral analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Loss of time

If real-time behavioral monitoring and response execution are implemented, then safety response time is reduced, but system operational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse time to undesirable behaviorVSAvoidsystem operational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-configures response actions and notification protocols before incidents occur. When undesirable behavior is detected, pre-programmed responses are immediately executed (e.g., sending alerts to authorities, notifying fleet managers, activating safety protocols), reducing response time while avoiding the complexity of real-time decision-making algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system operates autonomously by automatically detecting triggering conditions and executing predefined responses without requiring constant human intervention. The system self-manages data collection, analysis against triggering conditions, and response execution, reducing response time while the standardized automated processes keep operational complexity manageable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12054156B2Vehicle rider behavioral monitoring
Publication Date: 2024.08.06 SAMSARA INC
  • US12054156B2 patent drawing
  • US12054156B2 patent drawing
  • US12054156B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are systems, methods, and non-transitory computer-readable media for vehicle rider behavioral monitoring. A behavioral monitoring system uses sensor data received from vehicles to monitor the behavior of the vehicle riders (e.g., vehicle operator and/or vehicle passengers) and performs predetermined actions if undesirable behavior is detected. For example, the behavioral monitoring system can transmit a notification or generate a record if inappropriate language or actions are detected.