Autonomous Vehicle Behavior Modeling for Object Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in predicting the behavior of surrounding objects, such as pedestrians, automobiles, and bicycles, which can lead to accidents and inefficient navigation.

Innovation Solution

A server-based system that determines and updates behavior models for autonomous vehicles by analyzing object data, including world-view and actions-of-interest data, to predict the behavior of detected objects and adjust the vehicle's control strategy accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If autonomous vehicles use basic navigation systems, then the system complexity is low, but the ability to predict behavior of surrounding objects is insufficient leading to safety issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of autonomous vehicle navigationVSAvoidcomplexity of behavior prediction system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The behavior prediction system is segmented into multiple independent modules: detection module for identifying objects, classification module for categorizing objects, behavior model selection module for choosing appropriate prediction models, and prediction module for forecasting object behavior. Each module handles a specific aspect of the prediction task, improving overall reliability while keeping individual module complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary classification and selection of behavior models before actual prediction occurs. By pre-categorizing objects and selecting appropriate behavior models in advance, the system prepares prediction frameworks proactively, enhancing safety response time while organizing complexity into structured preliminary steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If the system uses detailed world-view data and actions-of-interest data for prediction, then prediction accuracy improves, but data processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of behavior predictionVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different levels of data processing and analysis to different objects based on their relevance and risk level. High-priority objects (pedestrians, cyclists) receive detailed world-view data analysis, while lower-priority objects receive simplified processing. This localized quality approach maintains high prediction accuracy for critical objects while reducing overall data processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system processes only the necessary portion of available data for each prediction task. Rather than analyzing all possible data elements equally, it selectively processes relevant features and actions-of-interest based on object classification, achieving sufficient prediction accuracy without the time cost of exhaustive data analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system continuously updates behavior models based on new data, then adaptability to different scenarios improves, but computational load increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability of behavior modelsVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic updates of behavior models at scheduled intervals rather than continuous real-time updates. This periodic action allows the system to adapt to changing scenarios and learn from new data while consuming computational energy in discrete bursts, reducing overall energy consumption compared to continuous model training.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from prediction outcomes to selectively update behavior models. When prediction errors occur or new patterns are detected, the system triggers targeted model updates only for affected scenarios, rather than continuously updating all models. This feedback-driven approach improves adaptability while minimizing unnecessary computational energy expenditure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12236327B1Automated system and method for modeling the behavior of vehicles and other agents
Publication Date: 2025.02.25 WAYMO LLC
  • US12236327B1 patent drawing
  • US12236327B1 patent drawing
  • US12236327B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus are provided for determining one or more behavior models used by an autonomous vehicle to predict the behavior of detected objects. The autonomous vehicle may collect and record object behavior using one or more sensors. The autonomous vehicle may then communicate the recorded object behavior to a server operative to determine the behavior models. The server may determine the behavior models according to a given object classification, actions of interest performed by the object, and the object's perceived surroundings.