Autonomous Vehicle Behavior Detection Using Sensor and Map Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in detecting and responding to discrete actions of nearby vehicles, which can lead to accidents and inefficiencies in navigation, as existing systems lack effective methods to analyze sensor data and adjust control strategies based on real-time environmental changes.

Innovation Solution

The system employs sensors such as cameras, radar, and laser range finders to detect nearby vehicles and compare their actions with map data, allowing the autonomous vehicle to alter its control strategy and position relative to other vehicles, thereby reducing the likelihood of accidents and optimizing travel efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the autonomous vehicle uses sensors to detect and analyze nearby vehicles' actions in real-time, then safety and navigation efficiency are improved, but device complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the detection and analysis process into distinct modules: sensor data acquisition, nearby vehicle detection, action identification, and control strategy adjustment. This modular segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while maintaining overall system reliability without excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-defining control strategies for various detected vehicle actions (e.g., lane changes, merges). When a nearby vehicle's action is detected, the corresponding pre-planned control strategy is activated, reducing real-time computational complexity while maintaining safety responses

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If the system filters and processes large amounts of sensor data to identify discrete actions, then measurement precision and response accuracy improve, but loss of time and processing delays increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement precisionVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential and relevant features from sensor data for action identification, such as position changes, velocity vectors, and trajectory patterns. By taking out only the critical information needed to detect discrete actions rather than processing all raw sensor data, the system maintains measurement precision while reducing processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by focusing computational resources on detecting specific discrete actions of interest (e.g., lane changes, sudden stops) rather than analyzing all possible vehicle behaviors. This selective approach maintains precision for critical actions while minimizing overall processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUSRE49650E1System and method for automatically detecting key behaviors by vehicles
Publication Date: 2023.09.12 WAYMO LLC
  • USRE49650E1 patent drawing
  • USRE49650E1 patent drawing
  • USRE49650E1 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the disclosure relate generally to detecting discrete actions by traveling vehicles. The features described improve the safety, use, driver experience, and performance of autonomously controlled vehicles by performing a behavior analysis on mobile objects in the vicinity of an autonomous vehicle. Specifically, an autonomous vehicle is capable of detecting and tracking nearby vehicles and is able to determine when these nearby vehicles have performed actions of interest by comparing their tracked movements with map data.