Vehicle Belief State Modeling for Noise-Robust Control Decisions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current autonomous and semi-autonomous vehicle systems face challenges in real-time decision-making due to issues with maintaining accurate belief states, particularly when sensor noise and errors occur, leading to potential failures in determining optimal vehicle control actions.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a belief state determination method that computes belief states directly from raw perception data without relying on belief update equations, using operational environment monitors to establish observations and provide these computed belief states to decision components for mapping to candidate vehicle control actions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If belief states are maintained using traditional belief update equations, then the system can track operational environment changes, but sensor noise and errors accumulate leading to inaccurate belief states

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebelief state accuracyVSAvoidsensor noise impact
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the belief state computation from the traditional recursive update process and performs it directly from sensor measurements. The operational environment monitor computes belief states directly from current sensor data rather than updating from previous belief states, effectively removing the accumulation path for sensor noise and errors to propagate through multiple update cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary computation of belief states from raw sensor data before feeding them to the decision component. By pre-computing accurate belief states from current measurements rather than relying on incremental updates, the system prepares clean, noise-free belief representations that are ready for immediate decision-making without carrying forward historical errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If belief states are computed directly from operational environment data, then sensor noise impact is reduced, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebelief state accuracyVSAvoidcomputation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the autonomous driving system into distinct functional components: an operational environment monitor that computes belief states from sensor data, and a decision component that uses these belief states for control decisions. This segmentation allows the computationally intensive belief state computation to be isolated and optimized independently, managing overall system complexity while maintaining high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If traditional belief update equations are used, then computational resources are conserved, but real-time decision-making reliability deteriorates due to error accumulation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoiddecision-making accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The operational environment monitor continuously computes belief states from current sensor measurements and feeds them to the decision component, which generates control actions that are executed by the vehicle. This feedback loop ensures that the most current and accurate belief states are always used for decision-making, preventing error accumulation while maintaining real-time responsiveness and computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11921506B2Belief state determination for real-time decision-making
Publication Date: 2024.03.05 NISSAN MOTOR CO LTD
  • US11921506B2 patent drawing
  • US11921506B2 patent drawing
  • US11921506B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Real-time decision-making for a vehicle using belief state determination is described. Operational environment data is received while the vehicle is traversing a vehicle transportation network, where the data includes data associated with an external object. An operational environment monitor establishes an observation that relates the object to a distinct vehicle operation scenario. A belief state model of the monitor computes a belief state for the observation directly from the operational environment data. The monitor provides the computed belief state to a decision component implementing a policy that maps a respective belief state for the object within the distinct vehicle operation scenario to a respective candidate vehicle control action. A candidate vehicle control action is received from the policy of the decision component, and a vehicle control action is selected for traversing the vehicle transportation from any available candidate vehicle control actions.