Vehicle Collision Avoidance for Bicycle Dynamics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle collision avoidance systems lack an effective strategy to handle collisions with bicycles, as they do not account for the specific dynamics of bicycle movement, such as transverse positioning and escape times, leading to inefficient collision avoidance maneuvers.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle system equipped with sensors to detect bicycles and a controller that calculates the time to collision and expected collision position, transmitting deceleration or cross avoidance control signals based on the bicycle's movement times to gradually reduce speed or temporarily stop the vehicle, thereby preventing collisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a uniform collision avoidance control strategy is applied to all objects, then the control system is simple to implement, but it cannot effectively handle the specific dynamics of bicycles such as transverse positioning and escape times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidance control strategyVSAvoidcontrol system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the collision avoidance control into different strategies based on object type. Specifically, it divides the control approach into uniform control for general objects and specialized control for bicycles, which accounts for their unique movement characteristics such as transverse positioning and escape times. This segmentation allows the system to adapt to different object dynamics without requiring complete redesign for each object type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic control adjustment by varying the collision avoidance strategy based on the detected object type. When a bicycle is detected, the system dynamically switches to a specialized control mode that considers bicycle-specific parameters like transverse position and escape time, rather than using a static uniform control approach. This dynamic adaptation enhances the system's ability to handle diverse object behaviors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the vehicle stops immediately to avoid collision with a bicycle, then collision risk is reduced, but the vehicle may stop unnecessarily when the bicycle is far from the driving lane

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidanceVSAvoidvehicle stopping control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent calculates the escape time of the bicycle in advance to determine whether immediate stopping is necessary. By performing this preliminary calculation, the system can distinguish between situations where the bicycle poses an immediate collision risk and those where it does not, thereby avoiding unnecessary stops while ensuring safety when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the bicycle's position, movement speed, and distance from the driving lane, using this feedback to dynamically adjust the stopping decision. This feedback mechanism allows the system to make informed decisions about whether to stop, preventing unnecessary stops when the bicycle is far from the lane while ensuring timely stops when collision risk is high.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If the vehicle gradually reduces speed to avoid collision, then the stopping distance is extended, but the collision avoidance may be insufficient when the bicycle is close to the driving lane

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed regulationVSAvoidcollision avoidance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts the speed reduction strategy based on the bicycle's proximity to the driving lane. When the bicycle is far from the lane, the system applies gradual speed reduction for smoother operation. When the bicycle approaches the lane, the system intensifies the deceleration to ensure adequate collision avoidance. This dynamic adjustment of braking intensity resolves the contradiction between smooth operation and effective collision avoidance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10308245B2Vehicle and method for controlling thereof
Publication Date: 2019.06.04 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US10308245B2 patent drawing
  • US10308245B2 patent drawing
  • US10308245B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle includes: a sensor configured to detect an object moving in front of the vehicle; a controller configured to determine a longitudinal driving time taken for the vehicle to drive to the object, and configured to transmit a deceleration avoidance control signal gradually reducing a driving speed of the vehicle so that the vehicle is stopped before colliding with the object or a cross avoidance control signal stopping the vehicle until the object escapes from a driving lane of the vehicle, based on the longitudinal driving time and a transverse moving time of the object; and a speed regulator configured to regulate the driving speed of the vehicle in response to the transmitted control signal.