Autonomous Vehicle Blockage Arbitration for Persistent Route Obstructions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in accurately storing and updating blockage information due to the dynamic nature of road conditions, as blockages such as double-parked vehicles are frequently removed, affecting the reliability of routing and maneuver decisions.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a blockage arbitration system that classifies and persists blockage information based on persistence, using sensors like LiDAR to detect and evaluate blockages, and associating them with time values for storage in a map database, allowing for accurate updating and alternate route calculation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If blockage information is stored in the map database, then routing decisions can be informed by historical blockage data, but the blockage information becomes outdated and unreliable when blockages are frequently removed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblockage information reliabilityVSAvoidblockage persistence duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of blockages as persistent or non-persistent before storing them in the map database. This preliminary action ensures that only blockages meeting persistence criteria are stored, preventing outdated information from compromising routing decision reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically updates blockage information by continuously monitoring whether stored blockages still exist in the environment. When a stored blockage is no longer detected, the system removes or updates the blockage information in the map database, ensuring the data remains current and reliable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of information

If all detected blockages are stored for routing decisions, then comprehensive blockage coverage is achieved, but non-persistent blockages clutter the map database and reduce navigation efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblockage information completenessVSAvoidnavigation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different quality standards to different blockages based on their persistence characteristics. Persistent blockages are stored with high detail in the map database for long-term routing planning, while non-persistent blockages are either excluded or stored with minimal information, optimizing database quality and navigation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments blockage information into distinct categories: persistent blockages suitable for map database storage and non-persistent blockages handled through immediate routing adjustments. This segmentation prevents clutter in the map database while maintaining comprehensive blockage awareness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If the system continuously monitors and updates blockage information, then routing accuracy is improved, but computational resources and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblockage detection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs continuous monitoring only for blockages classified as persistent, applying full measurement precision selectively. Non-persistent blockages are detected initially but not subjected to continuous monitoring, reducing computational energy consumption while maintaining routing accuracy for significant obstructions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary classification of blockages to determine persistence before initiating continuous monitoring. This preliminary action filters out non-persistent blockages from continuous tracking, reducing computational overhead while maintaining high detection accuracy for persistent obstacles that require ongoing attention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables autonomous vehicles to make informed routing decisions by accurately identifying and updating blockage information, improving navigation efficiency and safety by distinguishing between persistent and non-persistent blockages.

Implementation Method 1

using various sensor types, including but not limited to cameras and/or Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) sensors disposed on the AV

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight Detection and Ranging (LiDAR): LIDAR

Data Source

PatentUS12005923B2Blockage routing and maneuver arbitration
Publication Date: 2024.06.11 GM CRUISE HOLDINGS LLC
  • US12005923B2 patent drawing
  • US12005923B2 patent drawing
  • US12005923B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The subject disclosure relates to solutions for arbitrating traffic blockages along vehicle routes. In some aspects, the disclosed technology encompasses a method including steps for determining a vehicle route, wherein the vehicle route comprises at least one lane plan to be followed by an autonomous vehicle (AV), identifying a blockage along the vehicle route, analyzing the blockage to determine if the blockage constitutes a persistent blockage, and if the blockage constitutes a persistent blockage, associating a time value with the blockage. Systems and machine-readable media are also provided.