Vehicle Body Locking Apparatus Using Servo-Actuated Mechanical Interlocks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for securing and positioning vehicle bodies on pallets in assembly lines require complex hydraulic and pneumatic mechanisms, adding unnecessary components and complexity, and lack efficient methods for accommodating various vehicle builds and body styles.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing fixed stanchions with receivers and servo motors with locking arms and linkages to precisely position and secure vehicle bodies on pallets, eliminating the need for hydraulic or pneumatic mechanisms and allowing for adaptable positioning and locking mechanisms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If complex hydraulic and pneumatic mechanisms are used to secure vehicle bodies to pallets, then the securing function is achieved, but the device complexity and component count increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecuring functionVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the complex hydraulic and pneumatic mechanisms from the pallet system, replacing them with a simpler mechanical locking system using stanchions and receivers. This eliminates unnecessary components while maintaining the securing function through a more straightforward mechanical engagement system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the hydraulic and pneumatic systems with a purely mechanical locking mechanism. The stanchions with locking arms and receivers create a mechanical interlock system that secures the vehicle body to the pallet without requiring fluid power systems, thereby reducing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If fixed stanchions with receivers and servo motors are used to position and lock vehicle bodies, then positioning precision and locking accuracy improve, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning accuracyVSAvoidpositioning system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The stanchions are pre-positioned at fixed locations around the pallet, and the receivers are pre-installed on the pallet structure. This preliminary positioning allows for precise vehicle body placement without requiring complex real-time adjustment mechanisms, as the geometry of the pre-positioned components inherently guides accurate positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical locking system is designed to be self-aligning and self-locating. The vehicle body's position is automatically determined by the geometric relationship between the stanchions and receivers, eliminating the need for complex control systems while maintaining high positioning precision through mechanical self-service.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If a remote locking system without pneumatic or hydraulic mechanisms is used, then the component count is reduced, but the locking mechanism design becomes more challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent countVSAvoidlocking mechanism design
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The stanchions serve multiple functions: they provide structural support for the pallet, act as positioning guides for the vehicle body, and function as locking actuators through their integrated locking arms. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate components while simplifying the overall design through component consolidation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using active pneumatic or hydraulic systems to create locking force, the design inverts the approach by using passive mechanical geometry and gravity-assisted engagement. The locking arms naturally engage with the receivers through controlled movement, eliminating the need for complex actuation systems while achieving reliable locking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentEP3000697B1Vehicular body assembly locking apparatus and method
Publication Date: 2017.11.08 COMAU LLC
  • EP3000697B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3000697B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3000697B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A vehicle body (11) is positioned and locked on a movable vehicle support pallet (10) positioned at a vehicle build station. The support pallet is accurately and precisely positioned at a build station through alignment and inserting engagement of locating pads (86) in at least one four-way receiver (114) and at least one two way receiver (180) mounted to a build station foundation.