Vehicle Brake System Automatic Collision Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle brake systems do not automatically and effectively build up braking force in response to collisions, potentially leading to increased accident severity and secondary accidents.

Innovation Solution

A method that automatically builds up braking force in vehicles during collisions, differentiated by collision type, using sensor data to determine impact location and adjust braking force gradient, maximum, and delay, with the option to override by driver input, applicable to various brake systems and equipped with a regulation and control device for ESP control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If automatic braking force build-up is implemented in all collision situations, then accident severity is reduced, but driver control and flexibility are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccident severity reductionVSAvoiddriver control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The brake system dynamically adapts its behavior based on collision type. The control device automatically selects different braking strategies (frontal impact braking, rear impact braking, side impact braking) depending on sensor data, making the system flexible and context-appropriate rather than rigidly automatic in all situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes braking parameters (braking force magnitude, build-up rate, duration) based on the detected collision type. This allows the same automatic braking system to provide optimized performance for different accident scenarios while maintaining driver override capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Force

If braking force is built up immediately after collision detection, then vehicle displacement is minimized, but false activation risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking force build-up speedVSAvoidfalse activation prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment of collision parameters before activating automatic braking. Sensors detect and evaluate collision characteristics (direction, magnitude, type) to determine whether automatic braking activation is appropriate, preventing false activation while preparing the system for rapid response when truly needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control device continuously receives feedback from sensors monitoring vehicle state and collision parameters. This feedback loop allows the system to verify actual collision occurrence and characteristics before committing to automatic braking activation, reducing false positives while maintaining rapid response capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If different braking strategies are implemented for different collision types, then braking effectiveness is optimized, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking effectivenessVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automatic braking system is segmented into distinct control modules for different collision types (frontal impact, rear impact, side impact). Each module contains optimized braking parameters and strategies specific to its collision type, allowing independent optimization without requiring complete system redesign for each scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A single control device performs multiple functions by selecting from different braking strategies based on collision type. The system universally handles all collision scenarios through one integrated controller that adapts its behavior, avoiding the need for separate dedicated systems for each collision type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Loss of time

If hydraulic medium is prefilled in the braking unit, then braking response time is reduced, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking response timeVSAvoidhydraulic system energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The hydraulic medium is prefilled and pressurized in advance during vehicle operation or system initialization, preparing the braking system for immediate response. This preliminary preparation eliminates the time delay associated with hydraulic fluid delivery during emergency braking, though it requires energy investment during the preparation phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8930105B2Method for setting a brake system of a vehicle in the event of a collision
Publication Date: 2015.01.06 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US8930105B2 patent drawing
  • US8930105B2 patent drawing
  • US8930105B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a method for setting a brake system of a vehicle, braking force is built up automatically in the event of a collision. In the process, the position of the collision on the vehicle is determined and the build-up of braking force is implemented as a function of the position of the collision.