Vehicle Camera Comparison for Detecting Fallen Cargo

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vehicle technologies lack the capability to detect and alert drivers about objects that have fallen from the vehicle, posing safety risks for both the vehicle and surrounding traffic.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle system equipped with cameras to capture images of loaded objects and surroundings, using a control unit to compare images for fallen objects and alert drivers through audio, visual, or haptic feedback, and communicate with nearby vehicles to avoid the fallen object.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional obstacle detection technology is used, then obstacles on the road can be detected, but fallen objects from the vehicle cannot be identified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoiddetection scope
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The detection system is divided into multiple independent camera units (front camera, rear camera) that independently capture images of different regions. The front camera detects obstacles on the road, while the rear camera specifically monitors for fallen objects. This segmentation allows each detector to be optimized for its specific detection task, improving overall reliability and expanding detection scope.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit serves as an intermediary that receives detection results from both the front camera and rear camera, compares the detected objects, and determines whether an object has fallen from the vehicle. This intermediary processing enables the system to identify fallen objects by detecting objects that appear in the rear camera view but not in the front camera view, thereby expanding detection capability without compromising existing detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If multiple cameras are installed to detect fallen objects, then detection capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefallen object detectionVSAvoidcamera system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The rear camera performs multiple functions: it monitors for fallen objects, provides rearward viewing for the driver, and contributes to overall obstacle detection. This multi-functionality allows the system to improve fallen object detection capability without adding dedicated single-purpose components, thereby limiting the increase in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges the fallen object detection function with the existing obstacle detection infrastructure. The control unit combines detection data from the front camera and rear camera, and integrates the fallen object detection results with the driver alert system that already exists for obstacle warning. This merging approach allows improved detection capability while utilizing existing system components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Measurement precision

If real-time comparison of front and rear images is performed, then fallen objects are accurately identified, but processing time and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefallen object identification accuracyVSAvoidimage processing energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit extracts only the essential comparison operation: identifying objects detected by the rear camera that are not detected by the front camera. This extraction of the core detection logic avoids performing exhaustive image processing and comparison, thereby reducing energy consumption while maintaining accurate fallen object identification. The system takes out only the necessary computational steps rather than processing all image data comprehensively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20240290107A1Vehicle and method for facilitating detecting an object fallen from vehicle
Publication Date: 2024.08.29 CONTINENTAL AUTONOMOUS MOBILITY GERMANY GMBH
  • US20240290107A1 patent drawing
  • US20240290107A1 patent drawing
  • US20240290107A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle and method for facilitating detecting an object fallen from the vehicle. The vehicle includes: a camera to obtain an image of an object for storing prior information when the object is loaded into the vehicle, and an image of vehicle front surroundings and an image of vehicle rear surroundings when the vehicle is moving; and a control unit to detect an object from the front surroundings image and an object from the rear surroundings image using the prior information, and to compare the detected object from the front surroundings image with the detected object from the rear surroundings image. I If the object is not detected from the front surroundings image but detected from the rear surroundings image, the control unit determines that the object has fallen from the vehicle, and controls an output unit to output a signal.