Vehicle Carbon Footprint Ranking for Driving Behavior Modification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems fail to effectively rank and modify driving behaviors to reduce the carbon footprint of vehicles, particularly in subgroups with higher emissions, which contributes to environmental impact.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that determines subgroups of vehicles with higher carbon footprints and provides driving behavior modifications based on the driving behaviors of vehicles with lower carbon footprints, utilizing sensors, machine learning, and blockchain technology to authorize services and share data securely.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-generated harmful factors

If driving behavior modifications are implemented based on carbon footprint ranking, then carbon footprint is reduced, but system complexity increases due to subgroup determination and behavior analysis mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon footprintVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the fleet into subgroups based on carbon footprint metrics, allowing targeted behavior modifications for high-emission vehicles rather than uniform system-wide changes. This segmentation enables focused intervention on specific vehicles that need improvement while maintaining simplicity for the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where driving behaviors are continuously monitored, ranked, and used to generate modifications that are fed back to drivers. This automated feedback mechanism reduces the need for complex manual intervention systems while achieving effective carbon footprint reduction through data-driven behavior adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If real-time data sharing is implemented across vehicles, then driving behavior modification efficiency is improved, but information security risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebehavior modification efficiencyVSAvoidinformation security
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary layer (the server/platform) that mediates data sharing between vehicles. Instead of direct peer-to-peer data exchange which would create security vulnerabilities, the intermediary validates, processes, and securely distributes driving behavior data, enabling efficient information sharing while maintaining security controls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive driving behavior monitoring is implemented, then carbon footprint measurement precision is improved, but loss of driver privacy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon footprint measurement precisionVSAvoiddriver privacy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the specific driving behavior parameters necessary for carbon footprint calculation (acceleration patterns, braking behavior, speed maintenance) while excluding unrelated personal information. This selective extraction approach enables precise carbon footprint measurement without collecting excessive personal data that would compromise driver privacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS12460937B2Ranking carbon footprints of vehicles to determine driving behavior modifications
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 TOYOTA CONNECTED NORTH AMERICA INC
  • US12460937B2 patent drawing
  • US12460937B2 patent drawing
  • US12460937B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An example operation includes one or more of: determining a first subgroup of a group of vehicles and a second subgroup of the group of vehicles, wherein the second subgroup has a higher carbon footprint than the first subgroup; and determining a driving behavior modification of a vehicle in the second subgroup based on a driving behavior of one or more vehicles in the first subgroup.