Vehicle Cargo Monitoring With Route-Based Movement Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cargo management systems in vehicles fail to actively respond to cargo movement due to changes in vehicle speed, road terrain, and driving maneuvers, leading to inefficiency and potential cargo damage.

Innovation Solution

A computer system that uses sensors to monitor cargo movement and determines proactive preventive actions, such as adjusting the driving route or controlling vehicle systems, to stabilize cargo and prevent further movement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If passive monitoring systems are used to detect cargo movement, then cargo position can be detected, but the system cannot actively respond to prevent further cargo displacement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecargo position detectionVSAvoidactive cargo management capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a closed-loop feedback mechanism where sensors continuously monitor cargo position and feed this data to the control system. When cargo movement exceeds thresholds, the system automatically responds by adjusting vehicle operations (speed, acceleration, routing) to stabilize cargo, creating a dynamic adaptive management system that transitions from passive detection to active prevention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The cargo management system performs self-service by autonomously detecting cargo displacement, analyzing the situation, and implementing corrective actions without human intervention. The system uses its own sensor data to trigger automated vehicle control adjustments, enabling the system to manage itself and prevent cargo damage independently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Device complexity

If static cargo management solutions are implemented, then system complexity is reduced, but the system cannot adapt to varying transit conditions such as vehicle speed, road terrain, and driving maneuvers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem structureVSAvoidresponse to dynamic transit conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static to dynamic operation by continuously adjusting vehicle parameters (speed, acceleration, routing) based on real-time cargo position data. The control system modifies its behavior dynamically in response to changing transit conditions, creating an adaptive management approach that evolves with the operational context rather than following fixed predetermined rules

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (vehicle speed, acceleration rates, route selection) in response to detected cargo movement. By dynamically adjusting these parameters within acceptable ranges, the system adapts to varying transit conditions and cargo stability requirements, transforming a static management approach into a flexible, condition-responsive system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If manual cargo checks are performed frequently, then cargo safety is improved, but transportation efficiency decreases due to transport delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecargo safetyVSAvoidtransportation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual mechanical cargo inspection with automated electronic sensing and computer-controlled monitoring. Sensors continuously track cargo position without requiring physical intervention, and the control system automatically responds to detected movements, eliminating the need for frequent manual checks while maintaining or improving cargo safety and avoiding transport delays

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20250355441A1Managing loaded cargo in a vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.11.20 VOLVO TRUCK CORP
  • US20250355441A1 patent drawing
  • US20250355441A1 patent drawing
  • US20250355441A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer system comprising processing circuitry is disclosed. The processing circuitry is configured to obtain sensing data from a sensor monitoring a cargo space of a vehicle; determine, based on the sensing data, that at least a portion of a cargo in the cargo space is moved a threshold distance of the cargo space during operation of the vehicle; determine at least one preventive action to be carried out by the vehicle to prevent further movement of the cargo with respect to the threshold distance, the at least one preventive action comprising a driving route; and control the vehicle to at least partially carry out the at least one preventive action.