Transport Vehicle Charging Control to Prevent Fleet Charging Bottlenecks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional transport vehicle systems experience a decrease in transport efficiency due to multiple vehicles needing to be charged simultaneously, leading to a surge in charging demands that overwhelm the system.

Innovation Solution

A transport vehicle system with a controller that performs first and second determination processes to identify vehicles below specific charge thresholds, instructing charging based on system-wide margins and individual vehicle states to stagger charging times and maintain efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple transport vehicles are sent to charging facilities simultaneously when their battery voltage drops, then each vehicle can be charged individually, but the transport efficiency of the entire system decreases due to the need to charge multiple vehicles in a short period

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery charge availabilityVSAvoidtransport efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by monitoring battery voltages and identifying vehicles that will soon require charging. By predicting future charging needs and scheduling charges in advance, the system prevents multiple vehicles from requiring charging simultaneously, thereby maintaining transport efficiency while ensuring battery availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts charging schedules based on real-time battery voltage monitoring and predicted future states. By continuously updating the charging plan according to current system conditions and projected battery levels, the system optimizes the timing of charging operations to avoid system-wide charging bottlenecks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If the system monitors and manages charging for all transport vehicles, then charging coordination can be improved, but the control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging coordination efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system segments the fleet management task by identifying specific target vehicles that require charging based on their battery voltage characteristics. Rather than managing all vehicles uniformly, the system divides the fleet into groups based on charging needs, simplifying the control logic while maintaining effective coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring battery voltages and comparing them against threshold values. This feedback loop enables the controller to automatically adjust charging schedules based on real-time data, improving coordination efficiency without requiring complex manual intervention or overly sophisticated control algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260001416A1Transport vehicle system and method of controlling transport vehicles
Publication Date: 2026.01.01 MURATA MASCH LTD
  • US20260001416A1 patent drawing
  • US20260001416A1 patent drawing
  • US20260001416A1 patent drawing

AI summary

[Problem] To suppress a decrease in the transport efficiency of the entire system.[Means to Solve Problem] A controller 20 includes a charging instructor 21 that instructs to start charging each transport vehicle 10. The charging instructor 21 performs a first determination process to determine whether a charge rate of an entirety of the plurality of transport vehicles 10 is below a first threshold value, and instructs to start charging at least any one of the transport vehicles 10 if the charge rate of the entirety of the plurality of transport vehicles 10 is determined as being below the first threshold value. The charging instructor 21 performs a second determination process to determine whether the charge rate of each transport vehicle 10 is below a second threshold value that is lower than the first threshold value, and instructs to start charging each transport vehicle 10 if the charge rate of the transport vehicle 10 is determined as being below the second threshold value.