Modular Vehicle Chassis Joints Using 3D-Printed Node Connectors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional methods for fabricating joints in space frame and monocoque structures incur high equipment and manufacturing costs, and monocoque design lacks design flexibility when using planar elements or requires high tooling costs for shaped panels.

Innovation Solution

A method of 3-D printing joints for connecting tubes and panels, such as carbon fiber tubes and aluminum honeycomb panels, with geometric and physical features tailored to specific requirements, including centering features and adhesive application, to reduce manufacturing costs and enhance design flexibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional fabrication methods are used for joints in space frame and monocoque structures, then manufacturing precision and structural integrity can be achieved, but equipment and manufacturing costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoint fabrication precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the manufacturing method parameter from traditional subtractive or formative processes to additive manufacturing (3-D printing). This enables complex joint geometries to be fabricated directly from digital models, maintaining precision while eliminating expensive tooling and equipment requirements. The additive process allows for precise control of material deposition and joint geometry without the high costs associated with traditional fabrication methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If monocoque design uses planar elements, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but design flexibility is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoiddesign flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from two-dimensional planar elements to three-dimensional printed joints with complex spatial geometries. The 3-D printing process enables joints with multi-axis features, internal channels, and optimized structural topologies that cannot be achieved with planar elements. This dimensional enhancement provides significant design flexibility while maintaining manufacturing simplicity through digital fabrication processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If shaped panels are incorporated in monocoque design, then design flexibility is improved, but tooling costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign flexibilityVSAvoidtooling cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical tooling system (molds, dies, and forming equipment) with a digital additive manufacturing system. Instead of requiring expensive physical tooling to create shaped panels, the design is directly fabricated through 3-D printing layer by layer from digital models. This substitution eliminates tooling costs entirely while maintaining the ability to produce complex shaped panels and integrated joints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of manufacture

If 3-D printing is used for joints, then manufacturing costs are reduced and design flexibility is enhanced, but manufacturing precision may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidjoint fabrication precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The 3-D printing process incorporates self-correction and self-verification mechanisms through automated monitoring systems that track material deposition, layer alignment, and dimensional accuracy in real-time. The digital model serves as a self-check reference, allowing the system to detect and compensate for deviations during fabrication. This self-service capability ensures manufacturing precision is maintained while benefiting from the cost and flexibility advantages of additive manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20260001127A1Systems and methods for vehicle subassembly and fabrication
Publication Date: 2026.01.01 DIVERGENT TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US20260001127A1 patent drawing
  • US20260001127A1 patent drawing
  • US20260001127A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle chassis is provided. The vehicle chassis may comprise one or more vehicle chassis modules or chassis substructures that are formed from a plurality of customized chassis nodes and connecting tubes. The customized chassis nodes and connecting tubes may be formed of one or more metal and/or non-metal materials. The customized chassis nodes may be formed with connecting features to which additional vehicle panels or structures may be permanently or removeably attached. The vehicle chassis modules or chassis substructures may be interchangeably and removeably connected to provide a vehicle chassis having a set of predetermined chassis safety or performance characteristics.