Vehicle Collision Avoidance Using Merged ADS-B and Radar Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing number of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) poses a risk of collisions due to their entry into prohibited areas and obstacles, necessitating a system for collision avoidance between UAVs and other aerial vehicles.

Innovation Solution

A collision avoidance apparatus and method utilizing the Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast (ADS-B) system and radar components to collect and process data on vehicle positions and radar reflections, determining potential collisions and generating control signals to avoid them.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If radar ranging technique is used for collision avoidance, then detection capability in all weather conditions is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines ADS-B system and radar ranging device into a unified collision avoidance system. The ADS-B module receives broadcast information from other vehicles, while the radar module actively detects objects, and both feed data to the same determination module, creating a merged detection system that leverages strengths of both approaches

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The determination module serves multiple functions: it processes ADS-B data from other vehicles, analyzes radar detection results, calculates collision probabilities, and generates avoidance control signals. This multi-functional design reduces overall system complexity by consolidating processing logic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If ADS-B system is used for vehicle detection, then information transmission efficiency is improved, but detection precision for close-range objects deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation transmission efficiencyVSAvoiddetection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The detection system is segmented into two functional modules: ADS-B for long-range detection and radar for short-range detection. Each module operates in its optimal range, with the determination module integrating results from both segments to achieve comprehensive detection coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The determination module acts as an intermediary that receives and integrates data from both ADS-B and radar systems. It calculates collision probability by combining information from both sources, mediating between the two detection methods to produce a unified collision assessment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If collision avoidance system integrates multiple detection methods, then collision detection accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection using ADS-B for long-range vehicle detection before radar takes over for short-range object detection. This staged approach allows early identification of potential threats, reducing the burden on the radar system and simplifying real-time processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts detection strategies based on situational context. The determination module evaluates collision probability in real-time and can prioritize processing based on threat level, dynamically allocating computational resources to maintain accuracy while managing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively reduces the probability of collisions by enabling vehicles to take corresponding actions based on real-time data processing, ensuring safe navigation and operation.

Implementation Method 1

a radar signal transceiving device, electrically connected to the possible collision determination/avoidance module, transmitting a radar wave to the object, and receiving the radar reflection wave

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadar: Radar

Implementation Method 2

receiving the radar reflection wave

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS10573182B2Collision avoidance apparatus and method for vehicle
Publication Date: 2020.02.25 NAT CHUNG SHAN INST SCI & TECH
  • US10573182B2 patent drawing
  • US10573182B2 patent drawing
  • US10573182B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A collision avoidance apparatus for a vehicle includes a data collection module, collecting first automatic dependent surveillance broadcast (ADS-B) data of the vehicle itself, second ADS-B data of at least other one vehicle and a detection result related to a radar reflection wave reflected from an object within a first range; and a possible collision determination/avoidance module, electrically connected to the data collection module, determining whether the other one vehicle will collide with the vehicle according to the first and second ADS-B data and whether the object will collide with the vehicle according to the detection result, so as to generate a determination result, wherein the signal processing module generate a control signal to control the vehicle perform a corresponding action according to the determination result. Thus, collision avoidance can be achieved.