Traveling Vehicle Command Control at Branch-Switching Limits

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional traveling vehicle controllers often fail to assign commands efficiently, leading to late arrivals at destination points due to vehicles detouring at branch points, as they cannot change courses effectively within the branch-switching impossible distance range.

Innovation Solution

The controller performs pseudo-shift processing to determine traveling vehicles as being downstream of the branch point, excluding post-course-switch travel routes and adding correction times to ensure accurate route selection, thereby preventing detours and optimizing route choices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If the command is assigned to a traveling vehicle that is closest to the destination point, then the selection process is simple, but the vehicle may fail to change courses at the branch point and detour to reach the destination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommand assignment processVSAvoidarrival time at destination
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The controller performs preliminary evaluation of each traveling vehicle's ability to change courses at the branch point before assigning the command. This includes determining whether the vehicle is located within the branch-switching impossible distance range and can switch branches in time, preventing detours before they occur

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the simple geometric proximity-based selection with a sophisticated computational evaluation system that calculates branch-switching capability, travel time, and route optimization, substituting mechanical simplicity with intelligent algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of time

If the controller evaluates branch-switching capability for each vehicle, then arrival time is optimized, but the control process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearrival time at destinationVSAvoidcommand assignment process
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The command assignment process is segmented into distinct evaluation stages: determining branch-switching impossible distance range, evaluating branch-switching capability, calculating travel time for each vehicle, and final command assignment. This modular approach manages complexity through structured decomposition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes evaluation parameters based on vehicle positions and branch point characteristics, adjusting the branch-switching impossible distance range and capability criteria according to specific operational conditions to optimize both accuracy and processing efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If a traveling vehicle is located within the branch-switching impossible distance from the branch point, then the vehicle cannot change courses, but the vehicle may still be selected for command assignment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute assignment efficiencyVSAvoidcourse changing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The controller applies preliminary anti-action by identifying vehicles within the branch-switching impossible distance range and preemptively determining their inability to change courses, then excluding them from command assignment or adjusting their evaluation criteria before the assignment decision is made

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the determined branch-switching capability and impossible distance range information feed back into the command assignment evaluation, ensuring that vehicles with limited course-changing ability are appropriately considered or excluded based on their specific capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11513534B2Traveling vehicle controller and traveling vehicle system
Publication Date: 2022.11.29 MURATA MASCH LTD
  • US11513534B2 patent drawing
  • US11513534B2 patent drawing
  • US11513534B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A traveling vehicle controller includes a command assignment controller to detect a first-to-arrive traveling vehicle that is able to reach a destination point first among traveling vehicles, based on travel route candidates on which the traveling vehicles travel along a travel path from respective positions to reach the destination point, and assign the command to the first-to-arrive traveling vehicle. During detection of the first-to-arrive traveling vehicle, when a traveling vehicle traveling toward a branch point on the travel path is located within a range of a branch-switching impossible distance from the branch point and is scheduled to proceed toward a main way at the branch point, the command assignment controller performs pseudo-shift processing by which this traveling vehicle is determined to be located in a position downstream of the branch point and on a side of the main way.