Vehicle Remote Command Validity Control for Secure Operation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing remote operation systems for vehicles lack adequate security measures, allowing unauthorized access to unencrypted data and potential unintended vehicle operations due to communication failures or system malfunctions.

Innovation Solution

A service providing apparatus that includes a microprocessor and memory to manage remote operation instructions with validity periods and access locks, ensuring secure and timely execution of commands by in-vehicle terminals, and an authentication unit to verify the validity of the instructions and manage access locks and access keys to ensure secure and timely execution of the instructions and manage access to the system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If data is encrypted with a predetermined encryption key, then security is improved, but access control and authentication complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidauthentication complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

An authentication server is introduced as an intermediary between the terminal device and the data processing system. The authentication server manages encryption keys and validates authentication information, thereby improving security without increasing the complexity at the terminal device level. The server acts as a mediator that handles the cryptographic operations and key management centrally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The authentication and key management functions are extracted from the terminal device and relocated to a dedicated authentication server. This separation allows the terminal device to focus on its primary function while the server handles the complex authentication logic, improving security without burdening the terminal with excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of operation

If remote operation instructions are transmitted without validity period limits, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to potential unintended operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremote operation convenienceVSAvoidoperation safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A validity period is predetermined and attached to each remote operation instruction before transmission. This preliminary action ensures that instructions automatically expire after a specified time, preventing unintended operations while maintaining ease of use during the valid period. The validity period is set in advance based on the operation type and requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The validity period of remote operation instructions is made dynamic rather than static. Different operation types receive different validity periods based on their risk levels and requirements. High-risk operations have shorter validity periods, while low-risk operations have longer validity periods, optimizing both safety and convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If processing state information is continuously monitored, then reliability is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing monitoring accuracyVSAvoidterminal device energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuous monitoring, the system uses periodic monitoring at key checkpoints. The terminal device monitors processing state information at predetermined intervals or at specific events (e.g., when processing completes or encounters an error). This periodic approach maintains reliability for detecting processing failures while significantly reducing energy consumption compared to continuous monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service monitoring where the terminal device autonomously determines when monitoring is necessary based on processing state changes. The device monitors itself for critical events without requiring constant external supervision, reducing energy consumption while maintaining reliability for detecting processing failures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20260001509A1Data update method and system
Publication Date: 2026.01.01 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US20260001509A1 patent drawing
  • US20260001509A1 patent drawing
  • US20260001509A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A service providing apparatus includes a microprocessor and memory coupled to the microprocessor. The microprocessor performs: receiving operation instruction information transmitted from a user terminal and including an instruction of a remote operation for a vehicle; determining a validity period of the instruction, based on a type of the instruction included in the operation instruction information; and transmitting vehicle instruction information including the operation instruction information and validity period information to the in-vehicle terminal. The memory stores processing state information indicating a progress situation of processing performed by the in-vehicle terminal, based on the vehicle instruction information. The microprocessor further performs, unless processing result information indicating a result of the processing performed based on the vehicle instruction information from the in-vehicle terminal within the instruction validity period is received, updating the processing state information to information indicating that performing the processing is stopped.