Vehicle Computer Variation Detection and Remote Update

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Vehicle systems with multiple electronic components can exhibit unexpected behaviors due to variations that are not detected by existing technologies, leading to operational issues such as failed start-stop operations, wireless communication failures, and poor audio quality, without generating diagnostic trouble codes.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle computer system that detects variations using sensor and interface data, transmits this information to a remote computer, receives software updates, and installs them to remediate the issues, while also providing directives for user action or actuating vehicle actuators like hazard lights.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional diagnostic systems are used, then diagnostic trouble codes can be generated for obvious failures, but variations in vehicle behavior that do not generate diagnostic trouble codes cannot be detected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection of vehicle variationsVSAvoiddetection of variations without diagnostic trouble codes
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously monitoring vehicle parameters and comparing them against expected ranges before failures occur. The computer detects variations by analyzing sensor data trends and comparing actual values against predefined acceptable ranges, enabling early detection of behavioral deviations that do not constitute diagnostic trouble codes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring vehicle operation, comparing actual behavior against expected patterns, and providing real-time information about detected variations. The computer receives sensor data, analyzes it against expected ranges, and provides feedback about variations through the user interface, enabling ongoing detection and communication of vehicle behavior deviations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple electronic components are used in the vehicle system, then functionality and features are enhanced, but the system becomes more complex and harder to manage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle system functionalityVSAvoidvehicle computer system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle computer system performs multiple functions through a single integrated platform. The computer monitors various vehicle parameters from different sensors, detects variations across multiple systems, communicates with users through interface devices, and manages software updates. This multi-functional approach consolidates complexity into one central system rather than requiring separate management for each electronic component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service capabilities by automatically detecting variations, identifying relevant software updates, and installing corrections without requiring manual intervention. The computer autonomously monitors vehicle behavior, compares it against expected ranges, communicates detected variations to users, and manages the software update process, reducing the need for complex manual system management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If software updates are implemented to remediate variations, then vehicle operation reliability is improved, but system complexity and update management requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle operation reliabilityVSAvoidsoftware update management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service software update management by automatically identifying variations that require remediation, selecting appropriate software updates from available resources, and installing them without manual intervention. The computer monitors vehicle behavior, detects variations matching known patterns, identifies corresponding software updates, and executes the update process autonomously, reducing complexity compared to manual update management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback-driven update management by continuously monitoring vehicle operation, detecting variations, and using this information to trigger appropriate software updates. The computer receives feedback about vehicle behavior, compares it against expected patterns, and uses this information to identify when and what updates are needed, creating a closed-loop system that manages complexity through automated feedback-driven decision making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11941926B2Vehicle variation remediation
Publication Date: 2024.03.26 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US11941926B2 patent drawing
  • US11941926B2 patent drawing
  • US11941926B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle computer can be programmed to detect, in a vehicle, one of a plurality of variations, based on data received from one or more vehicle sensors or a vehicle interface, to transmit, to a remote computer, variation data including the detected variation and a version of software in the vehicle computer, wherein the variation data identifies the detected variation and the version of the software, to receive, from the remote computer, a response including that a software update is identified based on the detected variation, and upon identifying the software update, to download and install the software update in the vehicle computer.