Vehicle Configuration Management System for Lifecycle Discrepancy Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for managing the configuration of complex objects, such as aircraft, struggle with reconciling different bills of materials across various phases of their lifecycle, leading to inefficiencies and increased time and resources required for detecting discrepancies.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that compares data sets representing the configuration of a vehicle structure at different lifecycle phases, identifying differences in component identifications and recording dispositions, utilizing a computer system to manage and reconcile these differences.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If different bills of materials are created at different times using different systems, then the object can be managed through various lifecycle phases, but detecting discrepancies between the bills of materials becomes more time-consuming and difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to manage object through different lifecycle phasesVSAvoidtime required to detect discrepancies between bills of materials
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a computer system as an intermediary that automatically compares data sets from different bills of materials. The system includes a comparison module that reconciles engineering bills of materials with manufacturing bills of materials, identifying discrepancies automatically rather than requiring manual comparison by personnel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical comparison processes with automated computer-based data set comparison. The system uses software to automatically reconcile different bills of materials, substituting human effort and manual procedures with automated computational processes that are faster and more efficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If different bills of materials are created using different systems with different formats and data types, then the object configuration can be represented across various phases, but the complexity of reconciling these bills of materials increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to represent object configuration across different phasesVSAvoidcomplexity of reconciling bills of materials with different formats
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal comparison system that can handle multiple data formats and types. The computer system is designed to reconcile engineering bills of materials with manufacturing bills of materials that may be in different formats, making the system multi-functional and adaptable to various data representations across different lifecycle phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms and standardizes parameters from different data formats during the comparison process. The computer system adjusts and reconciles different data types and formats by changing parameters to a common standard, enabling automatic comparison despite initial format differences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If manual methods are used to reconcile bills of materials, then flexibility in handling different scenarios is maintained, but the process requires more time, effort, and resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in handling reconciliation scenariosVSAvoidefficiency of reconciliation process
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-service automated system where the computer system performs the reconciliation process independently without requiring manual intervention. The system automatically compares data sets, identifies discrepancies, and generates reports, freeing personnel from manual reconciliation tasks while maintaining the ability to handle various scenarios through programmed logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9904896B2Object management system
Publication Date: 2018.02.27 THE BOEING CO
  • US9904896B2 patent drawing
  • US9904896B2 patent drawing
  • US9904896B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for managing a configuration of a vehicle structure. Data sets are compared each representing the configuration of the vehicle structure at different phases in a lifecycle of the vehicle structure. Each of the data sets includes identifications of components for the vehicle structure. Differences are identified between the identifications of the components in the data sets.