Vehicle Consensus Network for Distributed Road Action Decisions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current networks of moving things, such as those comprising autonomous vehicles, are unable to adequately support achieving consensus for performing road actions, particularly in complex arrays of both moving and static nodes.

Innovation Solution

A communication network platform that provides connectivity, services, and Internet access to mobile and static things, featuring a robust, scalable, and energy-efficient architecture capable of adapting to various environments, with vehicles acting as Wi-Fi hotspots and using multi-network on-board units (OBUs) to connect vehicles to wired infrastructure and other vehicles, enabling consensus on road actions through distributed intelligence and secure decision-making protocols.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current networks of moving things are used to support autonomous vehicles, then basic connectivity is provided, but the network is unable to adequately support achieving consensus for performing road actions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsensus achievement capabilityVSAvoidsupport for complex arrays of moving and static nodes
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The network is segmented into multiple coordinated nodes (vehicles, infrastructure elements) that each perform localized consensus operations. This segmentation allows the system to handle complex arrays of nodes by dividing the consensus problem into manageable local decisions that aggregate to global road action consensus.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The network dynamically adapts its consensus mechanisms based on the type and density of nodes present. The system adjusts its communication protocols and decision-making processes in real-time to accommodate varying configurations of moving vehicles and static infrastructure, enabling reliable consensus achievement across diverse network compositions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If distributed intelligence is used to enable consensus on road actions, then safety and decision-making are improved, but network complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety through consensusVSAvoidnetwork architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A universal consensus protocol is implemented that serves multiple functions: safety verification, coordination of road actions, and conflict resolution. This multi-functional approach reduces overall system complexity by consolidating what could be separate complex subsystems into a single integrated distributed intelligence framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The distributed intelligence system incorporates continuous feedback loops where each node monitors and reports its state, decisions, and observations to the network. This feedback mechanism enables autonomous vehicles to achieve safety consensus through iterative communication and validation, reducing the complexity of centralized control while maintaining high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11386779B2Systems and methods for achieving road action consensus, for example among autonomous vehicles, in a network of moving things
Publication Date: 2022.07.12 VENIAM INC
  • US11386779B2 patent drawing
  • US11386779B2 patent drawing
  • US11386779B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for achieving road action consensus in a network of moving things. As non-limiting examples, various aspects of this disclosure provide systems and methods for achieving road action consensus in vehicles (e.g., autonomous vehicles, manually controlled vehicles, etc.) of a network of moving things.